Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use

被引:351
作者
Rengel, Zed [1 ]
Damon, Paul M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Earth & Geog Sci, Soil Sci & Plant Nutr M087, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01079.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Cultivars with increased efficiency of uptake and utilization of soil nutrients are likely to have positive environmental effects through reduced usage of chemicals in agriculture. This review assesses the available literature on differential uptake and utilization efficiency of K in farming systems. Large areas of agricultural land in the world are deficient in K (e.g. 3/4 of paddy soils in China, 2/3 of the wheatbelt in Southern Australia), with export in agricultural produce (especially hay) and leaching (especially in sandy soils) contributing to lowering of K content in the soil. The capacity of a genotype to grow and yield well in soils low in available K is K efficiency. Genotypic differences in efficiency of K uptake and utilization have been reported for all major economically important plants. The K-efficient phenotype is a complex one comprising a mixture of uptake and utilization efficiency mechanisms. Differential exudation of organic compounds to facilitate release of non-exchangeable K is one of the mechanisms of differential K uptake efficiency. Genotypes efficient in K uptake may have a larger surface area of contact between roots and soil and increased uptake at the root-soil interface to maintain a larger diffusive gradient towards roots. Better translocation of K into different organs, greater capacity to maintain cytosolic K+ concentration within optimal ranges and increased capacity to substitute Na+ for K+ are the main mechanisms underlying K utilization efficiency. Further breeding for increased K efficiency will be dependent on identification of suitable markers and compounding of efficiency mechanisms into locally adapted germplasm.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 636
页数:13
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Nutrient sensing and signalling in plants: Potassium and phosphorus [J].
Amtmann, A ;
Hammond, JP ;
Armengaud, P ;
White, PJ .
ADVANCES IN BOTANICAL RESEARCH, VOL 43: INCORPORATING ADVANCES IN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2006, 43 :209-257
[2]   Plant responses to potassium deficiencies: a role for potassium transport proteins [J].
Ashley, MK ;
Grant, M ;
Grabov, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2006, 57 (02) :425-436
[3]  
Barber S. A., 1995, SOIL NUTR BIOAVAILAB
[4]   Comparing the potassium requirements of canola and wheat [J].
Brennan, R. F. ;
Bolland, M. D. A. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2007, 58 (04) :359-366
[5]  
Brouder S. M., 1990, FIELD CROPS RES, V23, P3
[6]   The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants [J].
Cakmak, I .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 168 (04) :521-530
[7]   ISOLATION OF TOMATO STRAINS VARYING IN POTASSIUM ACQUISITION USING A SAND-ZEOLITE CULTURE SYSTEM [J].
CHEN, JJ ;
GABELMAN, WH .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1995, 176 (01) :65-70
[8]   Morphological and physiological characteristics of tomato roots associated with potassium-acquisition efficiency [J].
Chen, JJ ;
Gabelman, WH .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2000, 83 (3-4) :213-225
[9]  
Cianzio S. R., 1999, Mineral nutrition of crops: fundamental mechanisms and implications., P267
[10]  
Claassen N., 1999, Mineral nutrition of crops: fundamental mechanisms and implications., P327