Morphology and evolution of simulated and optical clusters: a comparative analysis

被引:9
作者
Rahman, N
Krywult, J
Motl, PM
Flin, P
Shandarin, SF
Melott, AL
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Phys & Astron, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Pedagog Univ, Inst Phys, Kielce, Poland
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
methods : N-body simulations; methods : statistical; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.10014.x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We have made a comparative study of morphological evolution in simulated dark matter (DM) haloes and X-ray brightness distribution, and in optical clusters. Samples of simulated clusters include star formation with supernovae feedback, radiative cooling and simulation in the adiabatic limit at three different redshifts, z= 0.0, 0.10 and 0.25. The optical sample contains 208 Abell, Corwin & Olowin (ACO) clusters within redshift, z <= 0.25. Cluster morphology, within 0.5 and 1.0 h(-1) Mpc from cluster centre, is quantified by multiplicity and ellipticity. We find that the distribution of the DM haloes in the adiabatic simulation appears to be more elongated than the galaxy clusters. Radiative cooling brings halo shapes in excellent agreement with observed clusters; however, cooling along with feedback mechanism makes the haloes more flattened. Our results indicate relatively stronger structural evolution and more clumpy distributions in observed clusters than in the structure of simulated clusters, and slower increase in simulated cluster shapes compared to those in the observed one. Within z <= 0.1, we note an interesting agreement in the shapes of clusters obtained from the cooling simulations and observation. We also note that the different samples of observed clusters differ significantly in morphological evolution with redshift. We highlight a few possibilities responsible for the discrepancy in morphological evolution of simulated and observed clusters.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 850
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
[51]  
MECKE KR, 1994, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V288, P697
[52]   Recent dynamical relaxation of galaxy clusters:: Evidence for a low-Ωm universe [J].
Melott, AL ;
Chambers, SW ;
Miller, CJ .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 559 (02) :L75-L78
[53]   Formation of cool cores in galaxy clusters via hierarchical mergers [J].
Motl, PM ;
Burns, JO ;
Loken, C ;
Norman, ML ;
Bryan, G .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 606 (02) :635-653
[54]   The radial distribution of galaxies in Λ cold dark matter clusters [J].
Nagai, D ;
Kravtsov, AV .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 618 (02) :557-568
[55]   Thermal conduction in clusters of galaxies [J].
Narayan, R ;
Medvedev, MV .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 562 (02) :L129-L132
[56]  
Norman ML, 1999, ASTROPHYS SPACE SC L, V240, P19
[57]   Shapes of clusters and groups of galaxies:: comparison of model predictions with observations [J].
Paz, DJ ;
Lambas, DG ;
Padilla, N ;
Merchán, M .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 366 (04) :1503-1510
[58]   Recent dynamical evolution of galaxy clusters [J].
Plionis, M .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 572 (01) :L67-L70
[59]   PRIMORDIAL DENSITY-FLUCTUATIONS AND THE STRUCTURE OF GALACTIC HALOES [J].
QUINN, PJ ;
SALMON, JK ;
ZUREK, WH .
NATURE, 1986, 322 (6077) :329-335
[60]   Measuring shapes of galaxy images - II. Morphology of 2MASS galaxies [J].
Rahman, N ;
Shandarin, SF .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 354 (01) :235-251