Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

被引:77
作者
Gonzalez, R
Smith, CD
Mason, E
Duncan, T
Wilson, R
Miller, J
Ramshaw, BJ
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Emory Endosurg Unit, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Atlanta Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Div Gen Surg, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
laparoscopy; colorectal surgery; conversions; complications; laparotomy;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-005-0258-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic procedures converted to open approaches have been associated with higher complication rates than laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Laparoscopic colorectal resections have relatively high conversion rates compared with other laparoscopic procedures. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of conversions compared with laparoscopic and open colorectal resections. METHODS: We reviewed 498 consecutive colorectal resections performed between 1995 and 2002. Procedures were divided into laparoscopic colorectal resections, open colorectal resections, or conversions. Demographics, underlying disease, type of procedure performed, and operative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 238 laparoscopic procedures performed, 182 were completed laparoscopically and 56 ( 23 percent) required conversion; 260 were performed open. Conversions were associated with greater blood loss (200 (range, 50 - 750) vs. 100 ( range, 30 - 900) ml), longer time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40 - 504) vs. 72 (range, 12 - 420) hr), and longer length of stay (6 (range, 2 - 67) vs.. 5 (range, 2 - 62) days) than the laparoscopic colorectal resections group. There was no difference in operative time, transfusion requirements, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or mortality between conversions and laparoscopic colorectal resections. Conversions resulted in fewer patients requiring transfusions (4 vs. 14 percent), shorter time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40 - 504) vs. 93 (range, 24 - 240) hr), and shorter length of stay (6 (range, 2 - 67) vs. 7 (range, 2-180) days) than in the open colorectal resections group. There were no differences in complications or mortality between the conversion group and the open colorectal resections group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal resections has a relatively high conversion rate; however, the converted cases have outcomes similar to open colorectal resections. In fact, the converted group required fewer blood transfusions than the open group. Experience and good judgment are fundamental for timely conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to open to decrease complication rates. Despite a high conversion rate, surgeons should consider laparoscopic colorectal resections, because even when necessary, conversion does not result in poorer outcomes than laparoscopic colorectal resections or open colorectal resections.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery - A randomized trial on short-term outcome [J].
Braga, M ;
Vignali, A ;
Gianotti, L ;
Zuliani, W ;
Radaelli, G ;
Gruarin, P ;
Dellabona, P ;
Di Carlo, V .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (06) :759-766
[2]   Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: is learning phase associated with increased morbidity? [J].
De Chaisemartin, C ;
Panis, Y ;
Mognol, P ;
Valleur, P .
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2003, 128 (02) :81-87
[3]   Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease [J].
Dwivedi, A ;
Chahin, F ;
Agrawal, S ;
Chau, WY ;
Tootla, A ;
Tootla, F ;
Silva, YJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (10) :1309-1314
[4]   Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery - A meta-analysis [J].
Gervaz, P ;
Pikarsky, A ;
Utech, M ;
Secic, M ;
Efron, J ;
Belin, B ;
Jain, A ;
Wexner, S .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (08) :827-832
[5]   Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Hasegawa, H ;
Kabeshima, Y ;
Watanabe, M ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Kitajima, M .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (04) :636-640
[6]  
Hellberg A, 2001, EUR J SURG, V167, P209
[7]   Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections [J].
Hildebrandt, U ;
Kessler, K ;
Plusczyk, T ;
Pistorius, G ;
Vollmar, B ;
Menger, MD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (02) :242-246
[8]   Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:: a randomised trial [J].
Lacy, AM ;
García-Valdecasas, JC ;
Delgado, S ;
Castells, A ;
Taurá, P ;
Piqué, JM ;
Visa, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9325) :2224-2229
[9]   Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease [J].
Le Moine, MC ;
Fabre, JM ;
Vacher, C ;
Navarro, F ;
Picot, MC ;
Domergue, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (02) :232-236
[10]   Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis [J].
Lo, CM ;
Fan, ST ;
Liu, CL ;
Lai, ECS ;
Wong, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (06) :513-517