Hardware removal: Indications and expectations

被引:214
作者
Busam, ML
Esther, RJ
Obremskey, WT
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr E, Div Orthopaed Trauma, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Orthopaed, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.5435/00124635-200602000-00006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although hardware removal is commonly done, it should not be considered a routine procedure. The decision to remove hardware has significant economic implications, including the costs of the procedure as well as possible work time lost for postoperative recovery. The clinical indications for implant removal are not well established. There are few definitive data to guide whether implant removal is appropriate. Implant removal may be challenging and lead to complications, such as neurovascular injury, refracture, or recurrence of deformity. When implants are removed for pain relief alone, the results are unpredictable and depend on both the implant type and its anatomic location. Current literature does not support the routine removal of implants to protect against allergy, carcinogenesis, or metal detection. Surgeons and patients should be aware of appropriate indications and have realistic expectations of the risks and benefits of implant removal.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 120
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm [J].
Beaupre, GS ;
Csongradi, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1996, 10 (02) :87-92
[2]
BEAUPRE GS, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P291
[3]
Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified? [J].
Boerger, TO ;
Patel, G ;
Murphy, JP .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (02) :79-81
[4]
Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: A potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units [J].
Bostman, O ;
Pihlajamaki, H .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 41 (05) :846-849
[5]
BIOMECHANICS OF TORSIONAL FRACTURES - STRESS CONCENTRATION EFFECT OF A DRILL HOLE [J].
BROOKS, DB ;
BURSTEIN, AH ;
FRANKEL, VH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1970, A 52 (03) :507-&
[6]
Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures [J].
Brown, OL ;
Dirschl, DR ;
Obremskey, WT .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2001, 15 (04) :271-274
[7]
INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING OF FEMORAL-SHAFT FRACTURES .3. LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF STATIC INTERLOCKING FIXATION [J].
BRUMBACK, RJ ;
ELLISON, TS ;
POKA, A ;
BATHON, GH ;
BURGESS, AR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (01) :106-112
[8]
BONE STRENGTH - EFFECT OF SCREW HOLES [J].
BURSTEIN, AH ;
VESSELY, JC ;
FRANKEL, VH ;
LUNSETH, P ;
CURREY, J ;
HEIPLE, KG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1972, 54 (06) :1143-+
[9]
Chapman MW, 2001, CHAPMANS ORTHOPAEDIC, V1, P375
[10]
Effect of trauma and pelvic fracture on female genitourinary, sexual, and reproductive function [J].
Copeland, CE ;
Bosse, MJ ;
McCarthy, ML ;
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Guzinski, GM ;
Hash, CS ;
Burgess, AR .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1997, 11 (02) :73-81