Surgical management of high risk prostate cancer: The Mayo Clinic experience

被引:14
作者
Boorjian, Stephen A.
Blute, Michael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; Gleason score; lymph nodes;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.03.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era has altered the clinical and demographic characteristics of men with newly-diagnosed prostate cancer, the impact on patients with high risk disease has been less predictable. We have long advocated aggressive surgical resection for patients with high risk prostate cancer at the Mayo Clinic, including patients with clinical T3 tumors, and have reported our results as well of radical prostatectomy with adjuvant hormonal therapy in the setting of lymph node positive disease. At the same time, multiple predictive models have been developed to assess the risk of disease progression following definitive therapy for prostate cancer. One such model is pretreatment risk group stratification, based on patients' PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical stage. Here, we will review Our institution's experience with surgical treatment for men with high risk prostate cancer, and will address the benefits and potential pitfalls of the pretreatment risk group classification model for high risk patients. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 532
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Iocca, A ;
Scherer, B ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) :119-125
[2]   Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: Local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases [J].
Coen, JJ ;
Zietman, AL ;
Thakral, H ;
Shipley, WU .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3199-3205
[3]   Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: Implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE) [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :S21-S25
[4]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[5]  
GS Schenk, 2006, COMPREHENSIVE TXB GE, P246
[6]  
ISAACS JT, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P6290
[7]   Changing nature of high risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy [J].
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Presti, Joseph C. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) :113-117
[8]   Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer [J].
Keating, Nancy L. ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Smith, Matthew R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (27) :4448-4456
[9]   Feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for patients with high risk or locally advanced prostate cancer: Results of a phase I/II study [J].
Konety, BR ;
Eastham, JA ;
Reuter, VE ;
Scardino, PT ;
Donat, SM ;
Dalbagni, G ;
Russo, P ;
Herr, HW ;
Schwartz, L ;
Kantoff, PW ;
Scher, H ;
Kelly, WK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) :709-713
[10]  
Meltzer D, 2001, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V91, P126