Dynamic modeling of predictive uncertainty by regression on absolute errors

被引:42
作者
Pianosi, F. [1 ]
Raso, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Elettron & Informaz, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Water Resources Management, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; CATCHMENT;
D O I
10.1029/2011WR010603
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Uncertainty of hydrological forecasts represents valuable information for water managers and hydrologists. This explains the popularity of probabilistic models, which provide the entire distribution of the hydrological forecast. Nevertheless, many existing hydrological models are deterministic and provide point estimates of the variable of interest. Often, the model residual error is assumed to be homoscedastic; however, practical evidence shows that the hypothesis usually does not hold. In this paper we propose a simple and effective method to quantify predictive uncertainty of deterministic hydrological models affected by heteroscedastic residual errors. It considers the error variance as a hydrological process separate from that of the hydrological forecast and therefore predictable by an independent model. The variance model is built up using time series of model residuals, and under some conditions on the same residuals, it is applicable to any deterministic model. Tools for regression analysis applied to the time series of residual errors, or better their absolute values, combined with physical considerations of the hydrological features of the system can help to identify the most suitable input to the variance model and the most parsimonious model structure, including dynamic structure if needed. The approach has been called dynamic uncertainty modeling by regression on absolute errors and is demonstrated by application to two test cases, both affected by heteroscedasticity but with very different dynamics of uncertainty. Modeling results and comparison with other approaches, i.e., a constant, a cyclostationary, and a static model of the variance, confirm the validity of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Probability Theory
[2]   A Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Bates, BC ;
Campbell, EP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (04) :937-947
[3]   Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1 - background and methodology [J].
Bowden, GJ ;
Dandy, GC ;
Maier, HR .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 301 (1-4) :75-92
[4]  
Box G.E., 2011, Bayesian inference in statistical analysis
[5]   AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSCEDASTICITY WITH ESTIMATES OF THE VARIANCE OF UNITED-KINGDOM INFLATION [J].
ENGLE, RF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (04) :987-1007
[6]   Generic error model for calibration and uncertainty estimation of hydrological models [J].
Goetzinger, Jens ;
Bardossy, Andras .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44
[7]   Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation [J].
Gupta, Hoshin V. ;
Wagener, Thorsten ;
Liu, Yuqiong .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (18) :3802-3813
[8]   Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory [J].
Kavetski, D ;
Kuczera, G ;
Franks, SW .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (03)
[9]   HESS Opinions 'A random walk on water' [J].
Koutsoyiannis, D. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (03) :585-601
[10]   Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm [J].
Kuczera, G ;
Parent, E .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 211 (1-4) :69-85