Socioeconomic Inequality in Disability Among Adults: A Multicountry Study Using the World Health Survey

被引:94
作者
Hosseinpoor, Ahmad R. [1 ]
Williams, Jennifer A. Stewart [2 ]
Gautam, Jeny [3 ]
Posarac, Aleksandra [4 ]
Officer, Alana [1 ]
Verdes, Emese [1 ]
Kostanjsek, Nenad [1 ]
Chatterji, Somnath [1 ]
机构
[1] World Hlth Org, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[3] Dianella Community Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
IMPAIRMENTS; HANDICAPS; MORTALITY; GENDER; LIFE;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2012.301115
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
Objectives. We compared national prevalence and wealth-related inequality in disability across a large number of countries from all income groups. Methods. Data on 218 737 respondents participating in the World Health Survey 2002-2004 were analyzed. A composite disability score (0-100) identified respondents who experienced significant disability in physical, mental, and social functioning irrespective of their underlying health condition. Disabled persons had disability composite scores above 40. Wealth was evaluated using an index of economic status in households based on ownership of selected assets. Socioeconomic inequalities were measured using the slope index of inequality and the relative index of inequality. Results. Median age-standardized disability prevalence was higher in the low- and lower middle-income countries. In all the study countries, disability was more prevalent in the poorest than in the richest wealth quintiles. Pro-rich inequality was statistically significant in 43 of 49 countries, with disability prevalence higher among populations with lower wealth. Median relative inequality was higher in the high-and upper middle-income countries. Conclusions. Integrating equity components into the monitoring of disability trends would help ensure that interventions reach and benefit populations with greatest need.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1286
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Ahmad OB., 2001, GPE discussion paper series No. 31
[2]
[Anonymous], 2001, International Classification of Functioning (2002)
[3]
[Anonymous], 2003, INNOVATION THE EUROP, DOI [10.1080/13511610304511, DOI 10.1080/13511610304511]
[4]
[Anonymous], 2008, CLOSING THE GAP IN A
[5]
From depressive symptoms to depressive disorders: the relevance of thresholds [J].
Ayuso-Mateos, Jose L. ;
Nuevo, Roberto ;
Verdes, Emese ;
Naidoo, Nirmala ;
Chatterji, Somnath .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 196 (05) :365-371
[6]
Health inequalities and welfare state regimes: theoretical insights on a public health 'puzzle' [J].
Bambra, Clare .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65 (09) :740-745
[7]
Barbotte E, 2001, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V79, P1047
[8]
Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio [J].
Aluísio JD Barros ;
Vânia N Hirakata .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3 (1) :1-13
[9]
BedirhanUstun T., 2003, Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism, P797
[10]
Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps [J].
Bickenbach, JE ;
Chatterji, S ;
Badley, EM ;
Üstün, TB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (09) :1173-1187