Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: A metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions

被引:21
作者
Camacho, CJ
Ma, H
Champ, PC
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Computat Biol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Mol Biophys Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
docking; protein interactions; scoring; complex structure; binding mechanism; recognition; desolvation; free energy;
D O I
10.1002/prot.20932
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Predicting protein-protein interactions involves sampling and scoring docked conformations. Barring some large structural rearrangement, rapidly sampling the space of docked conformations is now a real possibility, and the limiting step for the successful prediction of protein interactions is the scoring function used to reduce the space of conformations from billions to a few, and eventually one high affinity complex. An atomic level free-energy scoring function that estimates in units of kcal/mol both electrostatic and desolvation interactions (plus van der Waals if appropriate) of protein-protein docked conformations is used to rerank the blind predictions (860 in total) submitted for six targets to the community-wide Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI; http:// capri.ebi.ac.uk). We found that native-like models often have varying intermolecular contacts and atom clashes, making unlikely that one can construct a universal function that would rank all these models as native-like. Nevertheless, our scoring function is able to consistently identify the native-like complexes as those with the lowest free energy for the individual models of 16 (out of 17) human predictors for five of the targets, while at the same time the modelers failed to do so in more than half of the cases. The scoring of high-quality models developed by a wide variety of methods and force fields confirms that electrostatic and desolvation forces are the dominant interactions determining the bound structure. The CAPRI experiment has shown that modelers can predict valuable models of protein-protein complexes, and improvements in scoring functions should soon solve the docking problem for complexes whose backbones do not change much upon binding. A scoring server and programs are available at http://structure.pitt.edu.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 877
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]   Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin complex [J].
Carvalho, AL ;
Dias, FMV ;
Prates, JAM ;
Nagy, T ;
Gilbert, HJ ;
Davies, GJ ;
Ferreira, LMA ;
Romao, MJ ;
Fontes, CMGA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :13809-13814
[12]   PRINCIPLES OF PROTEIN-PROTEIN RECOGNITION [J].
CHOTHIA, C ;
JANIN, J .
NATURE, 1975, 256 (5520) :705-708
[13]   NATURE OF ACCESSIBLE AND BURIED SURFACES IN PROTEINS [J].
CHOTHIA, C .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1976, 105 (01) :1-14
[14]   Performance of the first protein docking server ClusPro in CAPRI rounds 3-5 [J].
Comeau, SR ;
Vajda, S ;
Camacho, CJ .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (02) :239-244
[15]   ClusPro:: An automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes [J].
Comeau, SR ;
Gatchell, DW ;
Vajda, S ;
Camacho, CJ .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (01) :45-50
[16]   CAPRI rounds 3-5 reveal promising successes and future challenges for RosettaDock [J].
Daily, MD ;
Masica, D ;
Sivasubramanian, A ;
Somarouthu, S ;
Gray, JJ .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (02) :181-186
[17]   SOLVATION ENERGY IN PROTEIN FOLDING AND BINDING [J].
EISENBERG, D ;
MCLACHLAN, AD .
NATURE, 1986, 319 (6050) :199-203
[18]   Improving CAPRI predictions:: Optimized desolvation for rigid-body docking [J].
Fernández-Recio, J ;
Abagyan, R ;
Totrov, M .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (02) :308-313
[19]  
GETZOFF ED, 1983, NATURE, V306, P287, DOI 10.1038/306287a0
[20]   ENERGETICS OF CHARGE CHARGE INTERACTIONS IN PROTEINS [J].
GILSON, MK ;
HONIG, BH .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1988, 3 (01) :32-52