Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma

被引:136
作者
Medeiros, FA
Zangwill, LM
Bowd, C
Sample, PA
Weinreb, RN
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Hamilton Glaucoma Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Ophthalmol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1167/iovs.05-1133
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
PURPOSE. To evaluate the influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of three imaging technologies for structural assessment in glaucoma: confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography. METHODS. One hundred five patients with glaucoma and 61 normal subjects were recruited from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS). All individuals underwent imaging with the GDx Variable Corneal and Lens Compensator (VCC; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II; Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany), and the Stratus OCT (Stratus OCT; Carl-Zeiss Meditec, Inc.) within a 6-month period. Severity of disease was based on the AGIS (Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study) visual field score. To evaluate the influence of severity of glaucoma and optic disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging instruments, the sensitivities of the tests were fitted as a function of the AGIS score and disc area, by using logistic marginal regression models. RESULTS. The severity of visual field loss had a significant influence on the sensitivity of all imaging instruments. More severe disease was associated with increased sensitivity. This influence was similar among the three instruments. With regard to optic disc area, larger optic discs were associated with decreased sensitivity for the Stratus OCT parameter Average Thickness and the GDx VCC parameter Nerve Fiber Indicator, whereas small optic discs were associated with increased sensitivity. For the HRT II parameter Moorfields regression analysis classification, an inverse effect was observed. CONCLUSION. The diagnostic performances of the GDx VCC, HRT II, and Stratus OCT were significantly influenced by the severity of the disease and optic disc size. These covariates should be taken into account when comparing the performances of these tests for glaucoma diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1015
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Bathija R, 1998, J GLAUCOMA, V7, P121
[2]
Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender [J].
Bowd, C ;
Zangwill, LM ;
Blumenthal, EZ ;
Vasile, C ;
Boehm, AG ;
Gokhale, PA ;
Mohammadi, K ;
Amini, P ;
Sankary, TM ;
Weinreb, RN .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2002, 19 (01) :197-207
[3]
THE LOGISTIC MODELING OF SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE OF A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST - PRESENTATION [J].
COUGHLIN, SS ;
TROCK, B ;
CRIQUI, MH ;
PICKLE, LW ;
BROWNER, D ;
TEFFT, MC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (01) :1-7
[4]
Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph [J].
Ford, BA ;
Artes, PH ;
McCormick, TA ;
Nicolela, MT ;
LeBlanc, RP ;
Chauhan, BC .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (06) :1145-1150
[5]
GAASTERLAND DE, 1994, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V101, P1445
[6]
Greaney MJ, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P140
[7]
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY [J].
HUANG, D ;
SWANSON, EA ;
LIN, CP ;
SCHUMAN, JS ;
STINSON, WG ;
CHANG, W ;
HEE, MR ;
FLOTTE, T ;
GREGORY, K ;
PULIAFITO, CA ;
FUJIMOTO, JG .
SCIENCE, 1991, 254 (5035) :1178-1181
[8]
JONAS JB, 1992, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V33, P2012
[9]
SPECTRUM BIAS IN THE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS - LESSONS FROM THE RAPID DIPSTICK TEST FOR URINARY-TRACT INFECTION [J].
LACHS, MS ;
NACHAMKIN, I ;
EDELSTEIN, PH ;
GOLDMAN, J ;
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
SCHWARTZ, JS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (02) :135-140
[10]
Leisenring W, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P1263, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970615)16:11<1263::AID-SIM550>3.0.CO