Update on the Methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: Insufficient Evidence

被引:78
作者
Petitti, Diana B. [1 ]
Teutsch, Steven M.
Barton, Mary B.
Sawaya, George F.
Ockene, Judith K.
DeWitt, Thomas
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Phoenix, AZ 85041 USA
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; SKIN-CANCER; STRENGTH; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUALITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) seeks to provide reliable and accurate evidence-based recommendations to primary care clinicians. However, clinicians indicate frustration with the lack of guidance provided by the USPSTF when the evidence is insufficient to make a recommendation. This article describes a new USPSTF plan to commission its Evidence-based Practice Centers to collect information in 4 domains pertinent to clinical decisions about prevention and to report this information routinely. The 4 domains are potential preventable burden, potential harm of the intervention, costs (both monetary and opportunity), and current practice. The process and rationale used to select these domains are presented, along with examples of how clinicians might use the information to guide clinical decision making when evidence is insufficient.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
[Anonymous], AHRQ PUBL
[2]
[Anonymous], 2003, GUID CLIN PREV SERV, V3rd
[3]
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations -: I:: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group -: art. no. 38 [J].
Atkins, D ;
Eccles, M ;
Flottorp, S ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Henry, D ;
Hill, S ;
Liberati, A ;
O'Connell, D ;
Oxman, AD ;
Phillips, B ;
Schünemann, H ;
Edejer, TTT ;
Vist, GE ;
Williams, JW .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (1)
[4]
Making policy when the evidence is in dispute [J].
Atkins, D ;
Siegel, J ;
Slutsky, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) :102-113
[5]
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[6]
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II:: Pilot study of a new system -: art. no. 25 [J].
Atkins, D ;
Briss, PA ;
Eccles, M ;
Flottorp, S ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Harbour, RT ;
Hill, S ;
Jaeschke, R ;
Liberati, A ;
Magrini, N ;
Mason, J ;
O'Connell, D ;
Oxman, AD ;
Phillips, B ;
Schünemann, H ;
Edejer, TTT ;
Vist, GE ;
Williams, JW .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 5 (1)
[7]
How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the US preventive services task force [J].
Barton, Mary B. ;
Miller, Therese ;
Wolff, Tracy ;
Petitti, Diana ;
LeFevre, Michael ;
Sawaya, George ;
Yawn, Barbara ;
Guirguis-Blake, Janelle ;
Calonge, Ned ;
Harris, Russell .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (02) :123-127
[8]
Lung cancer screening: Recommendation statement [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, P ;
Homer, CJ ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 140 (09) :738-739
[9]
Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :735-738
[10]
Bruce AJ, 2000, MAYO CLIN PROC, V75, P491