Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:84
作者
Ali, Muhammad Usman [1 ,3 ]
Miller, John [4 ]
Peirson, Leslea [1 ,2 ]
Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna [1 ,2 ]
Kenny, Meghan [1 ,3 ]
Sherifali, Diana [1 ,2 ]
Raina, Parminder [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, McMaster Evidence Review & Synth Ctr, 1280 Main St W,McMaster Innovat Pk,Room 207A, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hlth Sci Ctr Room HSC 3N25F,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Room HSC 2C,1200 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Lung cancer; Screening; Systematic review; Primary health care; DOSE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; SPIRAL CT; CHEST RADIOGRAPH; HEAVY SMOKERS; TRIAL; RISK; PROGRAM; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
Objectives. To examine evidence on benefits and harms of screening average to high-risk adults for lung cancer using chest radiology (CXR), sputum cytology (SC) and low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Methods. This systematic review was conducted to provide up to date evidence for Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) lung cancer screening guidelines. Four databases were searched to March 31, 2015 along with utilizing a previous Cochrane review search. Randomized trials reporting benefits were included; any design was included for harms. Meta-analyses were performed if possible. PROSPERO #CRD42014009984. Results. Thirty-four studies were included. For lung cancer mortality there was no benefit of CXR screening, with or without SC. Pooled results from three small trials comparing LDCT to usual care found no significant benefits for lung cancer mortality. One large high quality trial showed statistically significant reductions of 20% in lung cancer mortality over a follow-up of 6.5 years, for LDCT compared with CXR. LDCT screening was associated with: overdiagnosis of 10.99-25.83%; 11.18 deaths and 52.03 patients with major complications per 1000 undergoing invasive follow-up procedures; median estimate for false positives of 25.53% for baseline/once-only screening and 23.28% for multiple rounds; and 9.74 and 5.28 individuals per 1000 screened, with benign conditions underwent minor and major invasive follow-up procedures. Conclusion. The evidence does not support CXR screening with or without sputum cytology for lung cancer. High quality evidence showed that in selected high-risk individuals, LDCT screening significantly reduced lung cancer mortality and all-cause mortality. However, for its implementation at a population level, the current evidence warrants the development of standardized practices for screening with LDCT and follow-up invasive testing to maximize accuracy and reduce potential associated harms. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 314
页数:14
相关论文
共 84 条
[81]
Binomial Confidence Intervals and Contingency Tests: Mathematical Fundamentals and the Evaluation of Alternative Methods [J].
Wallis, Sean .
JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, 2013, 20 (03) :178-208
[82]
American Cancer Society Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines [J].
Wender, Richard ;
Fontham, Elizabeth T. H. ;
Barrera, Ermilo, Jr. ;
Colditz, Graham A. ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Ettinger, David S. ;
Etzioni, Ruth ;
Flowers, Christopher R. ;
Gazelle, G. Scott ;
Kelsey, Douglas K. ;
LaMonte, Samuel J. ;
Michaelson, James S. ;
Oeffinger, Kevin C. ;
Shih, Ya-Chen Tina ;
Sullivan, Daniel C. ;
Travis, William ;
Walter, Louise ;
Wolf, Andrew M. D. ;
Brawley, Otis W. ;
Smith, Robert A. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2013, 63 (02) :107-117
[83]
WILDE J, 1989, EUR RESPIR J, V2, P656
[84]
The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) Outcomes within 3 Years of a First Computed Tomography Scan [J].
Wilson, David O. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Fuhrman, Carl R. ;
Fisher, Stephen N. ;
Balogh, Paula ;
Landreneau, Rodney J. ;
Luketich, James D. ;
Siegfried, Jill M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 178 (09) :956-961