Reducing the contact time of a bouncing drop

被引:1093
作者
Bird, James C. [1 ]
Dhiman, Rajeev [2 ]
Kwon, Hyuk-Min [2 ]
Varanasi, Kripa K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Boston, MA 02155 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
IMPACT; TRANSITIONS; IMPALEMENT; DYNAMICS; SURFACES; LIQUID; WALL;
D O I
10.1038/nature12740
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
070301 [无机化学]; 070403 [天体物理学]; 070507 [自然资源与国土空间规划学]; 090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Surfaces designed so that drops do not adhere to them but instead bounce off have received substantial attention because of their ability to stay dry(1-4), self-clean(5-7) and resist icing(8-10). A drop striking a non-wetting surface of this type will spread out to a maximum diameter(11-14) and then recoil to such an extent that it completely rebounds and leaves the solid material(15-18). The amount of time that the drop is in contact with the solid-the 'contact time'-depends on the inertia and capillarity of the drop(1), internal dissipation(19) and surface-liquid interactions(20-22). And because contact time controls the extent to which mass, momentum and energy are exchanged between drop and surface(23), it is often advantageous to minimize it. The conventional approach has been to minimize surface-liquid interactions that can lead to contact line pinning(20-22); but even in the absence of any surface interactions, drop hydrodynamics imposes a minimum contact time that was conventionally assumed to be attained with axisymmetrically spreading and recoiling drops(21,24). Here we demonstrate that it is possible to reduce the contact time below this theoretical limit by using superhydrophobic surfaces with a morphology that redistributes the liquid mass and thereby alters the drop hydrodynamics. We show theoretically and experimentally that this approach allows us to reduce the overall contact time between a bouncing drop and a surface below what was previously thought possible.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1960, Transport Phenomena
[2]
Impact, recoil and splashing of molten metal droplets [J].
Aziz, SD ;
Chandra, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2000, 43 (16) :2841-2857
[3]
Bouncing or sticky droplets:: Impalement transitions on superhydrophobic micropatterned surfaces [J].
Bartolo, D ;
Bouamrirene, F ;
Verneuil, É ;
Buguin, A ;
Silberzan, P ;
Moulinet, S .
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 74 (02) :299-305
[4]
Retraction dynamics of aqueous drops upon impact on non-wetting surfaces [J].
Bartolo, D ;
Josserand, C ;
Bonn, D .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2005, 545 :329-338
[5]
Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives [J].
Bergeron, V ;
Bonn, D ;
Martin, JY ;
Vovelle, L .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6788) :772-775
[6]
Self-cleaning surfaces - virtual realities [J].
Blossey, R .
NATURE MATERIALS, 2003, 2 (05) :301-306
[7]
Extreme resistance of superhydrophobic surfaces to impalement: Reversible electrowetting related to the impacting/bouncing drop test [J].
Brunet, P. ;
Lapierre, F. ;
Thomy, V. ;
Coffinier, Y. ;
Boukherroub, R. .
LANGMUIR, 2008, 24 (19) :11203-11208
[8]
ON THE COLLISION OF A DROPLET WITH A SOLID-SURFACE [J].
CHANDRA, S ;
AVEDISIAN, CT .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1991, 432 (1884) :13-41
[9]
Maximal deformation of an impacting drop [J].
Clanet, C ;
Béguin, C ;
Richard, D ;
Quéré, D .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2004, 517 :199-208
[10]
Corrigan R., 1985, NASATM86986