A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting

被引:14
作者
Ciatto, S [1 ]
Brancato, B [1 ]
Baglioni, R [1 ]
Turci, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, I-50131 Florence, Italy
关键词
mammography; breast carcinoma; diagnosis; digital mammography; costs;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.010
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of full field digital mammography (FFDM) in alternative to conventional screen film mammography (SFM) in the current practice is delayed by the high costs of FFDM. The present study, performed at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica of Florence, using both FFDM and SM was aimed at estimating the impact of introducing the new FFDM technique on overall mammography costs. Material and methods: We estimated the differential costs of both methods, based on real expenditures. as provided by the administrative department, and on radiologists, radiographers and other staff's working time. Two different workload scenarios (5000 and 10,000 tests/year per mammography equipment) were considered. Common costs of both techniques were censored for study purpose. Results: Beside a higher cost due to purchase and hire/leasing costs of equipment, FFDM implies a greater workload for radiologists (reading time almost doubled). SFM implies a greater workload for the administrative staff to run the archive and for loading/unloading films of the roller viewer, whereas no different workload has been observed for radiographers. Overall FFDM costs EURO24.22-26.46 for examination more than SFM for the 5000 tests scenario and EURO9.91-12.15 more for the 10,000 tests scenario. Discussion: Although present study estimates cannot easily be generalised to any local setting, the model for cost calculation is easy to be exported to another scenario by applying different local parameters. The advantages made available by FFDM (computerised data recording, tele-transmission, tele-reporting, tele-consulting, automatic display on monitor of previous exams and use of CAD) may justify the higher cost, but a limited reduction in purchase and assistance costs could easily allow a turnover, with FFDM being more convenient than SFM even on the cost side. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 75
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening
[2]  
Ciatto S, 1991, Radiol Med, V82, P56
[3]  
Ciatto Stefano, 2004, Radiol Med, V107, P480
[4]  
Ciatto Stefano, 2003, Radiol Med, V106, P59
[5]  
Di Nubila Brunella, 2003, Radiol Med, V106, P297
[6]   Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center [J].
Freer, TW ;
Ulissey, MJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :781-786
[7]   The length of time necessary to break even after converting to digital mammography [J].
Hiatt, MD ;
Carr, JJ ;
Manning, RL .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2000, 6 (04) :222-224
[8]   Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer [J].
Lewin, JM ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Moss, LJ ;
Isaacs, PK ;
Karellas, A ;
Cutter, GR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) :671-677
[9]   Interpretation of digital mammograms: Comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display [J].
Pisano, ED ;
Cole, EB ;
Kistner, EO ;
Muller, KE ;
Hemminger, BM ;
Brown, ML ;
Johnston, RE ;
Kuzmiak, CM ;
Braeuning, MP ;
Freimanis, RI ;
Soo, MS ;
Baker, JA ;
Walsh, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (02) :483-488
[10]   Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II study [J].
Skaane, P ;
Skjennald, A .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (01) :197-204