The role of pediculolaminar fixation in compromised pedicle bone

被引:35
作者
Hilibrand, AS
Moore, DC
Graziano, GP
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,ORTHOPAED RES LABS,SECT ORTHOPAED SURG,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[3] RHODE ISL HOSP,PROVIDENCE,RI 02902
关键词
laminar hooks; lumbar spine; osteoporosis; pedicle screws; pull-out strength;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199602150-00008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This in vitro study analyzed the effects of a supralaminar hook on pedicle screw fixation in compromised pedicle bone. Objectives. To determine the ability of pediculolaminar fixation to restore pedicle screw pull-out strength after stripping of senile pedicle bone. Summary of Background Data. Despite improvements in pedicle screw design, the bone-screw interface remains the ''weakest link'' in pedicle screw fixation. This interface is especially vulnerable in osteoporotic bone, previously instrumented pedicles, and at the ends of long instrumentation constructs. Methods. Side-to-side testing between a pedicle screw and a pedicle screw supplemented with a supralaminar hook (pediculolaminar fixation) was performed in human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. Comparisons were made for intact and compromised pedicle bone. Results. Pediculolaminar fixation restored 89% of intact pedicle screw pull-out strength, whereas the pedicle screw alone restored only 19% of intact pull-out strength. The role of pediculolaminar fixation was greatest in weaker bone. Significant differences were noted in energy to failure and post-failure energy. In intact bone, the pediculolaminar construct did not increase pull-out strength or energy to failure, although it did have a greater post-failure energy. Conclusion. Pediculolaminar fixation can augment pedicle screw fixation in pedicle bone compromised by previous stripping or significant osteoporosis or both.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 451
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS IN A CORPECTOMY MODEL [J].
ASHMAN, RB ;
GALPIN, RD ;
CORIN, JD ;
JOHNSTON, CE .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (12) :1398-1405
[2]
BOUCHER HH, 1959, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V41, P248
[3]
INTERNAL FORCES AND MOMENTS IN TRANSPEDICULAR SPINE INSTRUMENTATION - THE EFFECT OF PEDICLE SCREW ANGLE AND TRANSFIXATION - THE 4R-4BAR LINKAGE CONCEPT [J].
CARSON, WL ;
DUFFIELD, RC ;
ARENDT, M ;
RIDGELY, BJ ;
GAINES, RW .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (09) :893-901
[4]
STATIC AND CYCLICAL BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL CONSTRUCTS [J].
CUNNINGHAM, BW ;
SEFTER, JC ;
SHONO, Y ;
MCAFEE, PC .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (12) :1677-1688
[5]
GARFIN SR, 1994, SPINE, V19, pS2254
[6]
EFFECTS OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY ON PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION [J].
HALVORSON, TL ;
KELLEY, LA ;
THOMAS, KA ;
WHITECLOUD, TS ;
COOK, SD .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (21) :2415-2420
[7]
KRAG MH, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V203, P75
[8]
CAUDO-CEPHALAD LOADING OF PEDICLE SCREWS - MECHANISMS OF LOOSENING AND METHODS OF AUGMENTATION [J].
LAW, M ;
TENCER, AF ;
ANDERSON, PA .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (16) :2438-2443
[9]
MARGULIES JY, 1994, ANN M N AM SPIN SOC
[10]
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF PEDICLE SCREW PLATE FIXATION OF LUMBAR SPINE [J].
MATSUZAKI, H ;
TOKUHASHI, Y ;
MATSUMOTO, E ;
HOSHINO, M ;
KIUCHI, T ;
TORIYAMA, S .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (11) :1159-1165