The performance of models relating species geographical distributions to climate is independent of trophic level

被引:119
作者
Huntley, B [1 ]
Green, RE
Collingham, YC
Hill, JK
Willis, SG
Bartlein, PJ
Cramer, W
Hagemeijer, WJM
Thomas, CJ
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Inst Ecosyst Sci, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Biol Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[3] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[4] Univ York, Dept Biol, York YO10 5YW, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Oregon, Dept Geog, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[6] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Dept Global Change & Nat Syst, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[7] European Bird Census Council, SOVON Dutch Ctr Field Ornithol, NL-6573 DG Beek Ubbergen, Netherlands
关键词
biodiversity; birds; butterflies; climate change; envelope models; Europe; goodness-of-fit; higher plants;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00598.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species - climate 'envelope' models are widely used to evaluate potential climate change impacts upon species and biodiversity. Previous studies have used a variety of methods to fit models making it difficult to assess relative model performance for different taxonomic groups, life forms or trophic levels. Here we use the same climatic data and modelling approach for 306 European species representing three major taxa ( higher plants, insects and birds), and including species of different life form and from four trophic levels. Goodness-of-fit measures showed that useful models were fitted for > 96% of species, and that model performance was related neither to major taxonomic group nor to trophic level. These results confirm that such climate envelope models provide the best approach currently available for evaluating reliably the potential impacts of future climate change upon biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [41] Mace GM, 1998, CONSERVATION CHANGIN
  • [42] Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence
    Manel, S
    Williams, HC
    Ormerod, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2001, 38 (05) : 921 - 931
  • [43] BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ROC ANALYSIS
    METZ, CE
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1978, 8 (04) : 283 - 298
  • [44] Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot
    Midgley, GF
    Hannah, L
    Millar, D
    Rutherford, MC
    Powrie, LW
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2002, 11 (06): : 445 - 451
  • [45] AN OUTLINE OF THE DYNAMICS OF ANIMAL POPULATIONS
    NICHOLSON, AJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1954, 2 (01) : 9 - 65
  • [46] SPECIES: A Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species
    Pearson, RG
    Dawson, TP
    Berry, PM
    Harrison, PA
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 154 (03) : 289 - 300
  • [47] Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?
    Pearson, RG
    Dawson, TP
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (05): : 361 - 371
  • [48] Peters RL, 1992, Global warming and biological diversity
  • [49] Preece RC, 1997, NATO ASI SER SER I, V47, P163
  • [50] VEGETATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA SINCE THE LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM
    PRENTICE, IC
    BARTLEIN, PJ
    WEBB, T
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1991, 72 (06) : 2038 - 2056