Comparative actions of a low pressure oxygen plasma and an atmospheric pressure glow discharge on the surface modification of polypropylene

被引:40
作者
Choi, HS
Rybkin, VV
Titov, VA
Shikova, TG
Ageeva, TA
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Taejon 305764, South Korea
[2] Ivanovo State Univ, Dept Microelect Devices & Mat Technol, Ivanovo 153000, Russia
关键词
atomic force microscopy; infrared spectroscopy; direct current; etching polypropylene; glow discharge with liquid electrolyte cathode;
D O I
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.037
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
We compared the action of low pressure oxygen plasma (LPOP) oil the Surface modification of polypropylene (PP) with that of atmospheric pressure glow discharge (APGD) with liquid electrolyte cathode. Both water and 0.05 M KCl aqueous solution were used as liquid cathodes in APGD system. The surface properties of PP were characterized by contact angle measurement followed by surface free energy calculation, Fourier Transform Infrared by Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR/ATR) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). It was found that the actions of two processes were qualitatively the same. After treating PP surface with both methods, we commonly observed OH-groups, C=O groups in ester, ketone and carboxyl groups, C=O groups in unsaturated ketones and aldehydes. Both modification processes were also able to improve surface free energy and surface smoothing. In spite of some common features, however, the kinetic regularities of two processes were different. Characteristic time to reach stationary state in LPOP was always shorter than in APGD. Etching rates were higher in LPOP. Besides, the depth profile of oxygen-containing groups was somewhat different as well as surface morphology. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4479 / 4488
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Novel AC and DC non-thermal plasma sources for cold surface treatment of polymer films and fabrics at atmospheric pressure [J].
Akishev, Y ;
Grushin, M ;
Napartovich, A ;
Trushkin, N .
PLASMAS AND POLYMERS, 2002, 7 (03) :261-289
[2]   INTERACTIONS WITH AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS OF THE AIR CORONA PRODUCTS [J].
BRISSET, JL ;
LELIEVRE, J ;
DOUBLA, A ;
AMOUROUX, J .
REVUE DE PHYSIQUE APPLIQUEE, 1990, 25 (06) :535-543
[3]  
DINARO AR, 1958, ELECTROCHEM SOC, V105, P265
[4]  
Gil'man AB, 1999, HIGH ENERG CHEM+, V33, P188
[5]  
GOODMAN J, 1973, J ELECTROANAL CHEM, V48, P319, DOI 10.1016/0368-1874(73)85106-8
[6]   Investigation of the chemical action of the gliding and "point" arcs between the metallic electrode and aqueous solution [J].
Janca, J ;
Kuzmin, S ;
Maximov, A ;
Titova, J ;
Czernichowski, A .
PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 1999, 19 (01) :53-67
[7]   FORMATION OF HYDROXYL RADICALS, HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE AND AQUEOUS ELECTRONS BY PULSED STREAMER CORONA DISCHARGE IN AQUEOUS-SOLUTION [J].
JOSHI, AA ;
LOCKE, BR ;
ARCE, P ;
FINNEY, WC .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1995, 41 (01) :3-30
[8]   ON THE YIELDS OF GLOW-DISCHARGE ELECTROLYSIS IN VARIOUS ATMOSPHERES [J].
KANZAKI, Y ;
NISHIMURA, N ;
MATSUMOTO, O .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1984, 167 (1-2) :297-300
[9]  
Kinloch A. J., 1987, ADHES ADHES
[10]   MASS SPECTROMETRY OF IONS IN GLOW DISCHARGES .5. OXYGEN [J].
KNEWSTUBB, PF ;
DAWSON, PH ;
TICKNER, AW .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1963, 38 (04) :1031-&