A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block

被引:56
作者
Casati, A
Borghi, B
Fanelli, G
Cerchierini, E
Santorsola, R
Sassoli, V
Grispigni, C
Torri, G
机构
[1] Vita Salute Univ, Hosp San Raffaele, IRCCS, Dept Anesthesiol, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Vita Salute Univ, Hosp San Raffaele, IRCCS, Dept Orthoped Surg, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[3] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, IRCCS, Dept Anesthesiol, Bologna, Italy
[4] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, IRCCS, Dept Pharm, Bologna, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200204000-00039
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II. patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 23). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofol infusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.59% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 990
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DESIGNING CLIN RES
[2]   A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers [J].
Bardsley, H ;
Gristwood, R ;
Baker, H ;
Watson, N ;
Nimmo, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 46 (03) :245-249
[3]   Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Fusco, P ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) :371-373
[4]   Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks [J].
Casati, A ;
Fanelli, G ;
Borghi, B ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) :1047-1052
[5]   A new anterior approach to the sciatic nerve block [J].
Chelly, JE ;
Delaunay, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (06) :1655-1660
[6]   ALKALINIZATION OF BUPIVACAINE FOR SCIATIC-NERVE BLOCKADE [J].
COVENTRY, DM ;
TODD, JG .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (06) :467-470
[7]   Comparison of S(-)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Cox, CR ;
Checketts, MR ;
Mackenzie, N ;
Scott, NB ;
Bannister, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (05) :594-598
[8]  
DENSON DD, 1992, REGION ANESTH, V17, P311
[9]   The comparative toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equipotent doses in rats [J].
Dony, P ;
Dewinde, V ;
Vanderick, B ;
Cuignet, O ;
Gautier, P ;
Legrand, E ;
Lavand'homme, P ;
De Kock, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (06) :1489-1492
[10]   Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: Failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications [J].
Fanelli, G ;
Casati, A ;
Garancini, P ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) :847-852