Formalizing dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning in knowledge-based systems

被引:46
作者
Garcia, Alejandro J. [1 ]
Chesnevar, Carlos I. [1 ]
Rotstein, Nicolas D. [1 ]
Simari, Guillermo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Artificial Intelligence Res & Dev Lab, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Knowledge-based systems; Explanation support; Abstract argumentation; Structured argumentation; Defeasible Logic Programming; EXPERT-SYSTEMS; LOGIC; AGENTS; SEMANTICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.036
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The concept of explanation has received attention from different areas in Computer Science, particularly in the knowledge-based systems and expert systems communities. At the same time, argumentation has evolved as a new paradigm for conceptualizing commonsense reasoning, resulting in the formalization of different argumentation frameworks and the development of several real-world argument-based applications. Although the notions of explanation and argument for a claim share many common elements in knowledge-based systems their interrelationships have not yet been formally studied in the context of the current argumentation research in Artificial Intelligence. This article explores these ideas by providing a new perspective on how to formalize dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning. To do this, we propose a formalization of explanations for abstract argumentation frameworks with dialectical constraints where different emerging properties are studied and analyzed. As a concrete example of the formalism introduced we show how it can be fleshed out in an implemented rule-based argumentation system. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3233 / 3247
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Defeasible reasoning in web-based forms through argumentation [J].
Alejandro Gomez, Sergio ;
Ivan Chesnevar, Carlos ;
Ricardo Simari, Guillermo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2008, 7 (01) :71-101
[2]  
Amgoud L, 2002, FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP, V77, P38
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Principles of Knowledge Representation
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Philosophical Explorations, DOI DOI 10.1080/1386979032000186863
[5]  
Atkinson K., 2005, ICAIL, P35
[6]   SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics [J].
Baroni, P ;
Giacomin, M ;
Guida, G .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 168 (1-2) :162-210
[7]   An introduction to argumentation semantics [J].
Baroni, Pietro ;
Caminada, Martin ;
Giacomin, Massimiliano .
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2011, 26 (04) :365-410
[8]  
Baroni P, 2009, ARGUMENTATION IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P25, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_2
[9]   Argumentation in artificial intelligence [J].
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. ;
Dunne, Paul E. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 171 (10-15) :619-641
[10]   A logic-based theory of deductive arguments [J].
Besnard, P ;
Hunter, A .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 128 (1-2) :203-235