Formalizing dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning in knowledge-based systems

被引:46
作者
Garcia, Alejandro J. [1 ]
Chesnevar, Carlos I. [1 ]
Rotstein, Nicolas D. [1 ]
Simari, Guillermo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Artificial Intelligence Res & Dev Lab, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Knowledge-based systems; Explanation support; Abstract argumentation; Structured argumentation; Defeasible Logic Programming; EXPERT-SYSTEMS; LOGIC; AGENTS; SEMANTICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.036
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The concept of explanation has received attention from different areas in Computer Science, particularly in the knowledge-based systems and expert systems communities. At the same time, argumentation has evolved as a new paradigm for conceptualizing commonsense reasoning, resulting in the formalization of different argumentation frameworks and the development of several real-world argument-based applications. Although the notions of explanation and argument for a claim share many common elements in knowledge-based systems their interrelationships have not yet been formally studied in the context of the current argumentation research in Artificial Intelligence. This article explores these ideas by providing a new perspective on how to formalize dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning. To do this, we propose a formalization of explanations for abstract argumentation frameworks with dialectical constraints where different emerging properties are studied and analyzed. As a concrete example of the formalism introduced we show how it can be fleshed out in an implemented rule-based argumentation system. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3233 / 3247
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]  
Rahwan I, 2009, ARGUMENTATION IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0
[42]  
Ricci F, 2011, RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS HANDBOOK, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1
[43]   Towards a visualization of arguing agents [J].
Schroeder, M .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2000, 17 (01) :15-26
[44]  
Simari G. R., 1994, INT C CHIL COMP SCI, P111
[45]  
Simari G. R., 1994, 4 IB C ART INT IBERA
[46]   A MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT OF DEFEASIBLE REASONING AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION [J].
SIMARI, GR ;
LOUI, RP .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 53 (2-3) :125-157
[47]  
Stolzenburg F., 2003, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, V13, P87
[48]  
Thimm M, 2008, FR ART INT, V172, P381
[49]  
Tintarev N, 2011, RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS HANDBOOK, P479, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_15
[50]  
VERHEIJ B, 1996, P 8 DUTCH C ART INT, P357