Consumer decisions in relationships

被引:87
作者
Simpson, Jeffry A. [1 ]
Griskevicius, Vladas [1 ]
Rothman, Alexander J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Consumer decision-making; Relationships; Dyadic framework; Attitudes; HUSBAND-WIFE INFLUENCE; PURCHASE DECISIONS; TRADE-OFFS; INTIMATE-RELATIONSHIPS; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; INVESTMENT MODEL; MARITAL ROLES; FAMILY; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Most research on consumer choice assumes that decisions are usually made by individuals, and that these decisions are based on an individual's personal attitudes, beliefs, and preferences. Yet, much consumer behavior from joint decisions to individual choices is directly or indirectly shaped by people with whom we have some relationship. In this target article, we examine how each member in a relationship can affect how consumer decisions are made. After reviewing foundational work in the area, we introduce a powerful and statistically sophisticated methodology to study decisions within relationships-a dyadic framework of decision-making. We then discuss how the study of consumer decisions in relationships can be informed by different theories in the relationships field, including attachment, interdependence, social power, communal/exchange orientations, relationship norms, and evolutionary principles. By building on the seminal foundations of prior joint-decision making research with theories and methods from contemporary relationship science, we hope to facilitate the integration of the consumer and relationships literature to better understand and generate novel hypotheses about consumer decisions in relationships. (C) 2012 Society for Consumer Psychology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 314
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   The costs of benefits: Help-refusals highlight key trade-offs of social life [J].
Ackerman, Joshua M. ;
Kenrick, Douglas T. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 12 (02) :118-140
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1985, INTENTIONS ACTIONS T, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-32
[3]  
[Anonymous], J CONSUMER IN PRESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ATTACHMENT ADULTHODD
[5]   Cultural and situational contingencies and the theory of reasoned action: Application to fast food restaurant consumption [J].
Bagozzi, RP ;
Wong, N ;
Abe, S ;
Bergami, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 9 (02) :97-106
[6]  
BERSCHEID E, 1977, JEALOUSY, P101
[7]  
Bowlby J., 1982, ATTACHMENT LOSS VOL, V1
[8]  
Burns A., 1977, ADV CONSUM RES, V4, P50
[9]   FACTORS MODERATING RESOLUTION OF PREFERENCE CONFLICT IN FAMILY AUTOMOBILE PURCHASING [J].
BURNS, AC ;
GRANBOIS, DH .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (01) :77-86
[10]   SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON HUMAN MATING [J].
BUSS, DM ;
SCHMITT, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (02) :204-232