Pre/postbronchodilator interrupter resistance values in healthy young children

被引:48
作者
Beydon, N
Amsallem, F
Bellet, M
Boule, M
Chaussain, M
Denjean, A
Matran, R
Wuyam, B
Alberti, C
Gaultier, C
机构
[1] Robert Debre Teaching Hosp, Dept Physiol, Paris, France
[2] St Vincent de Paul Teaching HOsp, Dept Physiol, Paris, France
[3] Trousseau Teaching Hosp, Dept Physiol, Paris, France
[4] Robert Debre Teaching Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth, Paris, France
[5] Arnaud de Villeneuve Teaching Hosp, Dept Pediat, Montpellier, France
[6] Morvan Teaching Hosp, Dept Physiol, Brest, France
[7] Poitiers Teaching HOsp, Dept Physiol, Poitiers, France
[8] Calmette Teachnig Hosp, Dept Physiol, Lille, France
[9] Grenoble Teachning Hosp, Dept Physiol, Grenoble, France
关键词
inspiratory and expiratory interrupter resistance; reference values; preschool children;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.2011082
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The interrupter technique estimates flow resistance. It entails occlusion of the airways during tidal breathing while flow and mouth pressure are recorded. This noninvasive technique Is easy to use In young children. The aim of the present study was to measure inspiratory and expiratory Interrupter resistance (Rint(insp), Rin(exp)) before and after bronchodilator administration in young healthy white children. We designed a multicenter study using a standardized procedure for Rint measurements. Centers In five French cities studied 91 children (48 boys and 43 girls; height, 92 to 129 cm; mean age 5.3+/-1.4 years). Mean values were not significantly different for Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) (0.78+/-0.21 versus 0.78+/-0.20 KPa L-1.second). However, the difference between Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) decreased significantly with age and being positive before 5 years and negative later on (p<0.02). Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) decreased significantly with height (Rint(insp) [KPa.L-1.second] = 2.289-1.37. 10(-2).H [cm], Rint(exp) [KPa.L-1.second] = 2.021-1.12.10(-2).H [cm]; p<0.001). Bronchodilator (salbutamol) administration significantly decreased Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) (p<0.001). Bronchodilator-induced changes (% of predicted values) in mean Rint(insp) and mean Rint(exp) were-15% (95% confidence interval, -46 to +15%) and -12% (95% confidence interval, -46 to +22%), respectively. Sex did not affect pre- or postbronchodilator values. Data from the present study may prove useful for testing lung function in young children with respiratory disorders who failed to cooperate with forced expiratory maneuvers.
引用
收藏
页码:1388 / 1394
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
2-E
[32]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH-PATTERNS OF THE AIRWAYS AND LUNG PARENCHYMA IN CHILDREN [J].
PAGTAKHAN, RD ;
BJELLAND, JC ;
LANDAU, LI ;
LOUGHLIN, G ;
KALTENBORN, W ;
SEELEY, G ;
TAUSSIG, LM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 56 (05) :1204-1210
[33]   Evaluation of a new interrupter device for measuring bronchial responsiveness and the response to bronchodilator in 3 year old children [J].
Phagoo, SB ;
Wilson, NM ;
Silverman, M .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (07) :1374-1380
[34]  
PHAGOO SB, 1993, EUR RESPIR J, V6, P996
[35]   Evaluation of the interrupter technique for measuring change in airway resistance in 5-year-old asthmatic children [J].
Phagoo, SB ;
Wilson, NM ;
Silverman, M .
PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1995, 20 (06) :387-395
[36]   COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS OF ASSESSING AIR-FLOW RESISTANCE BEFORE AND AFTER INDUCED AIRWAY NARROWING IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
PHAGOO, SB ;
WATSON, RA ;
SILVERMAN, M ;
PRIDE, NB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 79 (02) :518-525
[37]  
Solymar L, 1985, Pediatr Pulmonol, V1, P134, DOI 10.1002/ppul.1950010303
[38]   REFERENCE VALUES FOR RESIDUAL VOLUME, FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY AND TOTAL LUNG CAPACITY [J].
STOCKS, J ;
QUANJER, PH .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1995, 8 (03) :492-506
[39]  
TAUSSIG LM, 1977, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V116, P1031
[40]  
WALL MA, 1982, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V125, P158