When consumers care about being treated fairly: The interaction of relationship norms and fairness norms

被引:83
作者
Aggarwal, Pankaj [1 ]
Larrick, Richard P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Management, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Brand relationships; Communal; Exchange; Interactional fairness; Distributional fairness; Justice; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY; DECISIONS; ATTRIBUTIONS; ANTECEDENTS; DIFFERENCE; FRAMEWORK; MODERATOR; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prior research suggests that people assess overall fairness of an event by focusing on the distribution of the final outcome (distributive fairness) and on how they are treated by others during the conflict resolution process (interactional fairness). The primary goal of this work is to use a social relationship framework to study differences in consumers' responses to interactional fairness as revealed by their evaluations of a brand. Two types of relationships are examined exchange relationships in which benefits are given to get something back in return; and communal relationships in which benefits are given to take care of others' needs. Results of two studies suggest that the type of consumers' relationship with the brand moderates the effect of interactional fairness such that consumers who have a communal relationship are more responsive to interactional fairness under conditions of low distributive fairness while those who have an exchange relationship are more responsive under conditions of high distributive fairness. (C) 2011 Society for Consumer Psychology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 127
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   When good brands do bad [J].
Aaker, J ;
Fournier, S ;
Brasel, SA .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :1-16
[2]   Dimensions of brand personality [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (03) :347-356
[3]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[4]   The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior [J].
Aggarwal, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :87-101
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Research on Negotiation in Organisations
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   The situational impact of brand image beliefs [J].
Batra, R ;
Homer, PM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :318-330
[8]  
BLACKSTON M, 1993, ADVERT CONS, P113
[9]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208
[10]   When does high procedural fairness reduce self-evaluations following unfavorable outcomes? The moderating effect of prevention focus [J].
Brockner, Joel ;
De Cremer, David ;
Fishman, Ariel Y. ;
Spiegel, Scott .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (02) :187-200