The situational impact of brand image beliefs

被引:208
作者
Batra, R
Homer, PM
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Business Adm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15327663jcp1403_12
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 [经济学];
摘要
This study experimentally examines some situational influences on the formation and consequences of two brand image beliefs, pertaining to fun and sophistication (classiness). It tests McCracken's (1986) meaning transfer mechanisms and establishes that nonverbalized personality associations of celebrity endorsers on these dimensions can indeed reinforce equivalent consumer beliefs about a brand's fun and classiness benefits. However, this occurs only if a social consumption context is evoked, and only if the brand image beliefs are appropriate to the consumer schema for the product category involved. Moreover, under these facilitating conditions, such ad-created brand image beliefs have an impact only on brand purchase intentions and not on brand attitudes. Results have implications for the growing literature on different types of brand imagery associations, as well as for future research on the processing of nonverbal stimuli, the measurement of nonfunctional brand beliefs, and consumer inference processes.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 330
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
Aaker DavidA., 2009, MANAGING BRAND EQUIT
[2]
The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (01) :45-57
[3]
Dimensions of brand personality [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (03) :347-356
[4]
VECTOR MODEL OF PREFERENCES - ALTERNATIVE TO FISHBEIN MODEL [J].
AHTOLA, OT .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (01) :52-59
[5]
[Anonymous], 1987, NONVERBAL BEHAV COMM
[6]
[Anonymous], 1986, ADVERTISING CONSUMER
[7]
[Anonymous], J CONSUMER MARKETING
[8]
BADENHAUSEN K, 1996, FIN WORLD 0708, P50
[9]
BATRA R, 1993, ADVERT CONS, P83
[10]
AFFECTIVE RESPONSES MEDIATING ACCEPTANCE OF ADVERTISING [J].
BATRA, R ;
RAY, ML .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1986, 13 (02) :234-249