Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil

被引:247
作者
Beauchemin, KA [1 ]
McGinn, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Res Ctr, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
关键词
beef cattle; canola oil; essential oil; fumaric acid; greenhouse gas; methane;
D O I
10.2527/2006.8461489x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various additives. The experiment was designed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with 21-d periods and was conducted using 16 Angus heifers (initial BW of 260 32 kg). Treatments were: control (no additive), fumaric acid (175 g/d) with sodium bicarbonate (75 g/d), essential oil and spice extract (1 g/d), or canola oil (4.6% of DMI). The basal diet consisted of 75% whole-crop barley silage, 19% steamrolled barley, and 6% supplement (DM basis). Four large chambers (2 animals fed the same diet per chamber) were equipped to measure methane emissions for 3 d each period. Adding canola oil to the diet decreased (P = 0.009) total daily methane emissions by 32% and tended (P = 0.09) to decrease methane emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake by 21%. However, much of the reduction in methane emissions was due to decreased (P < 0.05) feed intake and lower (P < 0.05) total tract digestibility of DM and fiber. Digestibility of all nutrients was also lowered (P < 0.05) by feeding essential oil, but there were no effects on ruminal fermentation or methane emissions. In contrast, adding fumaric acid to the diet increased total VFA concentration (P = 0.03), increased propionate proportions (P = 0.01), and decreased the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.002), but there was no measurable effect on methane emissions. The study demonstrates that canola oil can be used to reduce methane losses from cattle, but animal performance may be compromised due to lower feed intake and decreased fiber digestibility. Essential oils had no effect on methane emissions, whereas fumaric acid caused potentially beneficial changes in ruminal fermentation but no measurable reductions in methane emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:1489 / 1496
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AOAC, 1995, OFF METH AN
[2]   Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro [J].
Asanuma, N ;
Iwamoto, M ;
Hino, T .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1999, 82 (04) :780-787
[3]  
Bayaru Eruden, 2001, Animal Science Journal, V72, P139
[4]  
Beauchemin KA, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P653
[5]   Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows:: Update review [J].
Boadi, D ;
Benchaar, C ;
Chiquette, J ;
Massé, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 84 (03) :319-335
[6]   Influence of different concentrations of disodium fumarate on methane production and fermentation of concentrate feeds by rumen micro-organisms in vitro [J].
Carro, MD ;
Ranilla, MJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2003, 90 (03) :617-623
[7]   Effects of a specific blend of essential oil compounds and the type of diet on rumen microbial fermentation and nutrient flow from a continuous culture system [J].
Castillejos, L ;
Calsamiglia, S ;
Ferret, A ;
Losa, R .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 119 (1-2) :29-41
[8]  
*CCAC, 1993, GUID CAR US EXP AN, V1
[9]   ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF PLANT ESSENTIAL OILS [J].
DEANS, SG ;
RITCHIE, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1987, 5 (02) :165-180
[10]   Comparative efficiency of various fats rich in medium-chain fatty acids to suppress ruminal methanogenesis as measured with RUSITEC [J].
Dohme, F ;
Machmüller, A ;
Wasserfallen, A ;
Kreuzer, W .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (03) :473-482