Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows:: Update review

被引:336
作者
Boadi, D [1 ]
Benchaar, C [1 ]
Chiquette, J [1 ]
Massé, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Dairy & Swine Res & Dev Ctr, Lennoxville, PQ J1M 1Z3, Canada
关键词
enteric methane; dairy cattle; mitigation;
D O I
10.4141/A03-109
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Enteric methane (CH4) emission is a major contributor to Canadian greenhouse gas emissions, and also a loss of feed energy during production. The objective of this paper is to provide an update on current management practices and new dietary strategies recently proposed to reduce CH4 emissions from ruminants. Existing mitigation strategies for dairy, e.g., the addition of ionophores, fats, use of high-quality forages, and increased use of grains, have been well researched and applied. These nutritional changes reduce CH4 emissions by manipulating ruminal fermentation, directly inhibiting methanogens and protozoa, or by diverting hydrogen ions away from methanogens. Current literature has identified new CH4 mitigation options. These include the addition of probiotics, acetogens, bacteriocins, archaeal viruses, organic acids, plant extracts (e.g., essential oils) to the diet, as well as immunization, and genetic selection of cows. These new strategies are promising, but more research is needed to validate these approaches and to assess in vivo their effectiveness in reducing CH4 production by dairy cows. It is also important to evaluate CH4 mitigation strategies in terms of the total greenhouse gas budget and to consider the cost associated with the carious strategies. More basic understanding of the natural differences in digestion efficiencies among animals as well as a better knowledge of methanogens and their interaction with other organisms in the rumen would enable us to exploit the potential of some of the new CH4 mitigation strategies for dairy cattle production.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 335
页数:17
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]  
Archer J. A., 1998, P 6 WORLD C GEN APPL, V25, P81
[2]   Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls [J].
Arthur, PF ;
Renand, G ;
Krauss, D .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2001, 68 (2-3) :131-139
[3]   Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro [J].
Asanuma, N ;
Iwamoto, M ;
Hino, T .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1999, 82 (04) :780-787
[4]   Potential to alter the content and composition of milk fat through nutrition [J].
Ashes, JR ;
Gulati, SK ;
Scott, TW .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1997, 80 (09) :2204-2212
[5]  
Baker S. K., 1997, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia, V21, P6
[6]   Rumen methanogens, and inhibition of methanogenesis [J].
Baker, SK .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1999, 50 (08) :1293-1298
[7]   Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle [J].
Basarab, JA ;
Price, MA ;
Aalhus, JL ;
Okine, EK ;
Snelling, WM ;
Lyle, KL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 83 (02) :189-204
[8]  
Bayaru Eruden, 2001, Animal Science Journal, V72, P139
[9]   Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach [J].
Benchaar, C ;
Pomar, C ;
Chiquette, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04) :563-574
[10]  
Benchaar C, 1998, J ANIM SCI, V76, P617