Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows:: Update review

被引:336
作者
Boadi, D [1 ]
Benchaar, C [1 ]
Chiquette, J [1 ]
Massé, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Dairy & Swine Res & Dev Ctr, Lennoxville, PQ J1M 1Z3, Canada
关键词
enteric methane; dairy cattle; mitigation;
D O I
10.4141/A03-109
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Enteric methane (CH4) emission is a major contributor to Canadian greenhouse gas emissions, and also a loss of feed energy during production. The objective of this paper is to provide an update on current management practices and new dietary strategies recently proposed to reduce CH4 emissions from ruminants. Existing mitigation strategies for dairy, e.g., the addition of ionophores, fats, use of high-quality forages, and increased use of grains, have been well researched and applied. These nutritional changes reduce CH4 emissions by manipulating ruminal fermentation, directly inhibiting methanogens and protozoa, or by diverting hydrogen ions away from methanogens. Current literature has identified new CH4 mitigation options. These include the addition of probiotics, acetogens, bacteriocins, archaeal viruses, organic acids, plant extracts (e.g., essential oils) to the diet, as well as immunization, and genetic selection of cows. These new strategies are promising, but more research is needed to validate these approaches and to assess in vivo their effectiveness in reducing CH4 production by dairy cows. It is also important to evaluate CH4 mitigation strategies in terms of the total greenhouse gas budget and to consider the cost associated with the carious strategies. More basic understanding of the natural differences in digestion efficiencies among animals as well as a better knowledge of methanogens and their interaction with other organisms in the rumen would enable us to exploit the potential of some of the new CH4 mitigation strategies for dairy cattle production.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 335
页数:17
相关论文
共 157 条
[11]  
Benchaar C., 2003, CAN J ANIM SCI, V83, P637
[12]   PREDICTION OF AMOUNT OF METHANE PRODUCED BY RUMINANTS [J].
BLAXTER, KL ;
CLAPPERTON, JL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1965, 19 (04) :511-+
[13]   Methane production from dairy and beef heifers fed forages differing in nutrient density using the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique [J].
Boadi, DA ;
Wittenberg, KM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (02) :201-206
[14]   Effects of grain supplementation on methane production of grazing steers using the sulphur (SF6) tracer gas technique [J].
Boadi, DA ;
Wittenberg, KM ;
McCaughey, WR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (02) :151-157
[15]   Effects of dry plant extracts on fermentation and methanogenesis in continuous culture of rumen microbes [J].
Broudiscou, LP ;
Papon, Y ;
Broudiscou, AF .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 87 (3-4) :263-277
[16]  
Callaway TR, 1996, J ANIM SCI, V74, P1982
[17]   The effect of nisin and monensin on ruminal fermentations in vitro [J].
Callaway, TR ;
DeMelo, AMS ;
Russell, JB .
CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (02) :90-96
[18]   Synchronization of carbohydrate and protein sources on fermentation and passage rates in dairy cows [J].
Casper, DP ;
Maiga, HA ;
Brouk, MJ ;
Schingoethe, DJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1999, 82 (08) :1779-1790
[19]   EFFECT OF MONENSIN AND LASALOCID-SODIUM ON THE GROWTH OF METHANOGENIC AND RUMEN SACCHAROLYTIC BACTERIA [J].
CHEN, M ;
WOLIN, MJ .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 38 (01) :72-77
[20]   Effect of diet and probiotic addition on chemical composition of free or particle-associated bacterial populations of the rumen [J].
Chiquette, J ;
Benchaar, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1998, 78 (01) :115-120