PCA-SDG based process monitoring and fault diagnosis

被引:152
作者
Vedam, H [1 ]
Venkatasubramanian, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Lab Intelligent Proc Syst, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
multiple fault diagnosis; multivariate statistics; qualitative analysis; digraphs;
D O I
10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00040-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Significant research has been done in recent years to use principal component analysis (PCA) for process fault diagnosis. The general approach involves manual interpretation of measured variable contributions to the residual and/or principal components. For a large chemical process, this could be tedious and often impossible. In addition, it hampers the automation of high-level analysis and decision support tasks that require root cause information. In this work, the interpretation of PCA-based contributions is automated using signed digraphs (SDGs). Also, a serious limitation of SDG-based diagnosis - the assumption of a single fault is overcome by developing a SDG-based multiple fault diagnosis algorithm. The implementation of the PCA-SDG-based fault diagnosis algorithms is done using G2. Its application is illustrated on the Amoco Model IV Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU). (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 917
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Detecting persistent gross errors by sequential analysis of principal components [J].
Tong, HW ;
Crowe, CM .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 20 :S733-S738
[22]   Signed digraph based multiple fault diagnosis [J].
Vedam, H ;
Venkatasubramanian, V .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 21 :S655-S660
[23]  
VENKATASUBRAMAN.V, 1995, PROCESS FAULT DIAGNO
[24]   THE POSSIBLE CAUSE AND EFFECT GRAPHS (PCEG) MODEL FOR FAULT-DIAGNOSIS .1. METHODOLOGY [J].
WILCOX, NA ;
HIMMELBLAU, DM .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 18 (02) :103-116
[25]  
WISE BM, 1996, PLS TOOLBOX USE MATL
[26]   PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS [J].
WOLD, S ;
ESBENSEN, K ;
GELADI, P .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1987, 2 (1-3) :37-52