The leading eight: Social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity

被引:327
作者
Ohtsuki, H [1 ]
Iwasa, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
cooperation; reputation; standing; justified defection; leading eight; social norm;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.008
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The theory of indirect reciprocation explains the evolution of cooperation among unrelated individuals, engaging in one-shot interaction. Using reputation, a player acquires information on who are worth cooperating and who are not. In a previous paper, we formalized the reputation dynamics, a rule to assign a binary reputation (good or bad) to each player when his action, his current reputation, and the opponent's reputation are given. We then examined all the possible reputation dynamics, and found that there exist only eight reputation dynamics named "leading eight" that can maintain the ESS with a high level of cooperation, even if errors are included in executing intended cooperation and in reporting the observation to the public. In this paper, we study the nature of these successful social norms. First, we characterize the role of each pivot of the reputation dynamics common to all of the leading eight. We conclude that keys to the success in indirect reciprocity are to be nice (maintenance of cooperation among themselves), retaliatory (detection of defectors, punishment, and justification of punishment), apologetic, and forgiving. Second, we prove the two basic properties of the leading eight, which give a quantitative evaluation of the ESS condition and the level of cooperation maintained at the ESS. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 444
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS SOCIAL DIL
[2]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[3]  
Axelrod R, 2006, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[4]   Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Katok, E ;
Ockenfels, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (08) :1457-1468
[5]   PUNISHMENT ALLOWS THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION (OR ANYTHING ELSE) IN SIZABLE GROUPS [J].
BOYD, R ;
RICHERSON, PJ .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1992, 13 (03) :171-195
[6]   Indirect reciprocity, image scoring, and moral hazard [J].
Brandt, H ;
Sigmund, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (07) :2666-2670
[7]   The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation [J].
Brandt, H ;
Sigmund, K .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (04) :475-486
[8]   The nature of human altruism [J].
Fehr, E ;
Fischbacher, U .
NATURE, 2003, 425 (6960) :785-791
[9]   A MODEL OF REPUTATION BUILDING AND DESTRUCTION [J].
HERBIG, P ;
MILEWICZ, J ;
GOLDEN, J .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (01) :23-31
[10]   SOCIAL NORMS AND COMMUNITY ENFORCEMENT [J].
KANDORI, M .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1992, 59 (01) :63-80