Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array

被引:52
作者
Brill, Stefan [2 ]
Mueller, Joachim [2 ]
Hagen, Rudolf [2 ]
Moeltner, Alexander [1 ]
Brockmeier, Steffi-Johanna [3 ,8 ]
Stark, Thomas [3 ,4 ]
Helbig, Silke [5 ]
Maurer, Jan [6 ]
Zahnert, Thomas [7 ]
Zierhofer, Clemens [9 ]
Nopp, Peter [1 ]
Anderson, Ilona [1 ]
Strahl, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] MED EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Plast Aesthet & Reconstruct, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, HNO Klin, Munich, Germany
[4] Ruhr Univ Bochum, St Elisabeth Hosp, HNO Klin, Bochum, Germany
[5] Klinikum JW Goethe Univ, HNO Heilkunde, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz, HNO Klin, Koblenz, Germany
[7] Univ Klinikum Carl Gustav Carus, HNO Heilkunde, Dresden, Germany
[8] Univ Basel, HNO Klin, Basel, Switzerland
[9] Univ Innsbruck, Christian Doppler Lab, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
来源
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE | 2009年 / 8卷
关键词
SPEECH-PERCEPTION; SPIRAL GANGLION; IMPLANT USERS; NEURAL EXCITATION; SPATIAL SPREAD; RECIPIENTS; INSERTION; MASKING; NERVE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/1475-925X-8-40
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: The standard electrode array for the MED-EL MAESTRO cochlear implant system is 31 mm in length which allows an insertion angle of approximately 720 degrees. When fully inserted, this long electrode array is capable of stimulating the most apical region of the cochlea. No investigation has explored Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) recordings in this region with a large number of subjects using a commercially available cochlear implant system. The aim of this study is to determine if certain properties of ECAP recordings vary, depending on the stimulation site in the cochlea. Methods: Recordings of auditory nerve responses were conducted in 67 subjects to demonstrate the feasibility of ECAP recordings using the Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (ART (TM)) feature of the MED-EL MAESTRO system software. These recordings were then analyzed based on the site of cochlear stimulation defined as basal, middle and apical to determine if the amplitude, threshold and slope of the amplitude growth function and the refractory time differs depending on the region of stimulation. Results: Findings show significant differences in the ECAP recordings depending on the stimulation site. Comparing the apical with the basal region, on average higher amplitudes, lower thresholds and steeper slopes of the amplitude growth function have been observed. The refractory time shows an overall dependence on cochlear region; however post-hoc tests showed no significant effect between individual regions. Conclusions: Obtaining ECAP recordings is also possible in the most apical region of the cochlea. However, differences can be observed depending on the region of the cochlea stimulated. Specifically, significant higher ECAP amplitude, lower thresholds and steeper amplitude growth function slopes have been observed in the apical region. These differences could be explained by the location of the stimulating electrode with respect to the neural tissue in the cochlea, a higher density, or an increased neural survival rate of neural tissue in the apex.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential [J].
Abbas, PJ ;
Hughes, ML ;
Brown, CJ ;
Miller, CA ;
South, H .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2004, 9 (04) :203-213
[2]   Firing features and potassium channel content of murine spiral ganglion neurons vary with cochlear location [J].
Adamson, CL ;
Reid, MA ;
Mo, ZL ;
Bowne-English, J ;
Davis, RL .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2002, 447 (04) :331-350
[3]  
ANDERSON I, 2007, CRD2005CIP001 FSI CL
[4]  
Bortz J., 2005, Statistik fur Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler
[5]   The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults [J].
Brown, CJ ;
Hughes, ML ;
Luk, B ;
Abbas, PJ ;
Wolaver, A ;
Gervais, J .
EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (02) :151-163
[6]  
Brown JT, 1998, CERAM ENG SCI PROC, V19, P1
[7]   Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients [J].
Cohen, LT ;
Saunders, E ;
Richardson, LM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (06) :346-355
[8]   Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking [J].
Cohen, LT ;
Richardson, LM ;
Saunders, E ;
Cowan, RSC .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 179 (1-2) :72-87
[9]  
de Sa JoaquimP. Marques., 2007, APPL STAT USING SPSS
[10]   A model of a Nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential [J].
Franck, KH .
EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (01) :67S-71S