Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody

被引:150
作者
Meyer, M [1 ]
Steinhauer, K
Alter, K
Friederici, AD
von Cramon, DY
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Cognit Neurosci, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Neuropsychol, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Georgetown Univ, Brain & Language Lab, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[4] McGill Univ, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
关键词
functional MRI; dynamic pitch variation; sentence prosody; peri-sylvian cortex; planum temporale; frontal operculum; Rolandic operculum; basal ganglia; language and motor integration; auditory rehearsal;
D O I
10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00350-X
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Fourteen native speakers of German heard normal sentences, sentences which were either lacking dynamic pitch variation (flattened speech), or comprised of intonation contour exclusively (degraded speech). Participants were to listen carefully to the sentences and to perform a rehearsal task. Passive listening to flattened speech compared to normal speech produced strong brain responses in right cortical areas, particularly in the posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG). Passive listening to degraded speech compared to either normal or flattened speech particularly involved fronto-opercular and subcortical (Putamen, Caudate Nucleus) regions bilaterally. Additionally the Rolandic operculum (premotor cortex) in the right hemisphere subserved processing of neat sentence intonation. As a function of explicit rehearsing sentence intonation we found several activation foci in the left inferior frontal gyros (Broca's area), the left inferior precentral sulcus, and the left Rolandic fissure. The data allow several suggestions: First, both flattened and degraded speech evoked differential brain responses in the pSTG, particularly in the planum temporale (PT) bilaterally indicating that this region mediates integration of slowly and rapidly changing acoustic cues during comprehension of spoken language. Second, the bilateral circuit active whilst participants receive degraded speech reflects general effort allocation. Third, the differential finding for passive perception and explicit rehearsal of intonation contour Suggests a right fronto-lateral network for processing and a left fronto-lateral network for producing prosodic information. Finally, it appears that brain areas which subserve speech (frontal operculum) and premotor functions (Rolandic operculum) coincidently support the processing of intonation contour in spoken sentence comprehension. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 289
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[21]   Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing [J].
Friederici, AD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (02) :78-84
[22]   The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension:: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Rüschemeyer, SA ;
Hahne, A ;
Fiebach, CJ .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2003, 13 (02) :170-177
[23]  
Friston K.J., 1994, Human Brain Mapping, V2, P189, DOI DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402
[24]   Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: An fMRI study [J].
Gandour, J ;
Dzemidzic, M ;
Wong, D ;
Lowe, M ;
Tong, YX ;
Hsieh, L ;
Satthamnuwong, N ;
Lurito, J .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 84 (03) :318-336
[25]   A cross-linguistic fMRI study of spectral and temporal cues underlying phonological processing [J].
Gandour, J ;
Wong, D ;
Lowe, M ;
Dzemidzic, M ;
Satthamnuwong, N ;
Tong, YX ;
Li, XJ .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 14 (07) :1076-1087
[26]   Understanding emotional prosody activates right hemisphere regions [J].
George, MS ;
Parekh, PI ;
Rosinsky, N ;
Ketter, TA ;
Kimbrell, TA ;
Heilman, KM ;
Herscovitch, P ;
Post, RM .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 53 (07) :665-670
[27]   The planum temporale as a computational hub [J].
Griffiths, TD ;
Warren, JD .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2002, 25 (07) :348-353
[28]   Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception [J].
Hickok, G ;
Poeppel, D .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (04) :131-138
[29]   A neural correlate of syntactic encoding during speech production [J].
Indefrey, P ;
Brown, CM ;
Hellwig, F ;
Amunts, K ;
Herzog, H ;
Seitz, RJ ;
Hagoort, P .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (10) :5933-5936
[30]  
JANCKE L, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P1161