Development, Stability, and Molecular Mechanisms of Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni

被引:64
作者
Caldwell, Dave Bryson [1 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Lin, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Anim Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.00450-08
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Previous studies of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter were primarily focused on strains from various origins or used in vitro systems. In this study, we conducted both in vitro and in vivo experiments to examine the development, stability, and genetic basis of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni using erythromycin-resistant (Ery(r)) mutants derived from the same parent strain. Chickens inoculated with low-level Ery(r) mutants (MIC = 32 or 64 mu g/ml) at 15 days old did not shed highly Ery(r) mutants (MIC > 512 mu g/ml) after prolonged exposure to a low dose of tylosin. The low-level Ery resistance was not stable in vitro or in vivo in the absence of macrolide selection pressure. However, high-level Ery resistance displayed remarkable stability in vitro and in vivo. Ribosomal sequence analysis of 69 selected Eryr mutants showed that specific point mutations (A2074G or A2074C) occurred in all highly Ery(r) mutants. No mutations in ribosomal protein L4 were observed in any of the in vitro-selected Ery(r) mutants. However, three specific mutations in L4, G74D, G57D, and G57V, were widely found among in vivo-selected Ery(r) mutants. Insertion of three amino acids, TSH, at position 98 in ribosomal protein L22 was observed only in mutants selected in vitro. Inactivation of the CmeABC efflux pump dramatically reduced Ery MICs in Ery(r) mutants. Together, these findings suggest that multiple factors contribute to the emergence of highly Ery(r) Campylobacter in chicken, reveal resistance level-dependent stability of macrolide resistance in C. jejuni, and indicate that C. jejuni utilizes complex and different mechanisms to develop Ery resistance in vitro and in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:3947 / 3954
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Allos BM, 2001, CLIN INFECT DIS, V32, P1201, DOI 10.1086/319760
[2]   The biological cost of mutational antibiotic resistance: any practical conclusions? [J].
Andersson, Dan I. .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 9 (05) :461-465
[3]   The biological cost of antibiotic resistance [J].
Andersson, DI ;
Levin, BR .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 2 (05) :489-493
[4]   Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria [J].
Andersson, DI .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 6 (05) :452-456
[5]   Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from cattle farms in Washington State [J].
Bae, W ;
Kaya, KN ;
Hancock, DD ;
Call, DR ;
Park, YH ;
Besser, TE .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (01) :169-174
[6]   Synergy between efflux pump CmeABC and modifications in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 in conferring macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli [J].
Cagliero, Cedric ;
Mouline, Christian ;
Cloeckaert, Axel ;
Payot, Sophie .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (11) :3893-3896
[7]  
*CLIN LAB STAND I, 2006, M100S16 CLSI
[8]   Relative contribution of target gene mutation and efflux to varying quinolone resistance in Irish Campylobacter isolates [J].
Corcoran, D ;
Quinn, T ;
Cotter, L ;
Fanning, S .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 253 (01) :39-46
[9]   Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C-coli:: Resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates [J].
Engberg, J ;
Aarestrup, FM ;
Taylor, DE ;
Gerner-Smidt, P ;
Nachamkin, I .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (01) :24-34
[10]  
Friedman C.R., 2000, CAMPYLOBACTER, V2nd, P121