Information Sharing and Order Variability Control Under a Generalized Demand Model

被引:153
作者
Chen, Li [1 ]
Lee, Hau L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
supply chain management; information sharing; inventory control; order smoothing; variability reduction; MMFE model; CHAIN INVENTORY MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY-CHAIN; APPROXIMATE SOLUTIONS; FORECASTS; EVOLUTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1080.0983
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The value of information sharing and how it could address the bullwhip effect have been the subject of studies in the literature. Most of these studies used different forms of demand models, assuming that no order smoothing was used by the retailer and that the supplier has full knowledge of the retailer's demand model and order policy. In this paper, we contribute to the literature by starting with a most general demand model, coupled with a smoothing policy for order variability control. In addition, we do not require that the supplier has full knowledge of the retailer's demand model and order policy, but instead let the retailer share its projected future orders (and freely revise them as the retailer sees fit). Under such a setting, we first obtain a unifying formula for the magnitude of the bullwhip effect. The formula indicates that it is the forecast correlation over the exposure period as a whole that determines the magnitude of the bullwhip effect. We then quantify the value of information sharing and generalize the existing results in the literature. Finally, we explore the optimal smoothing parameters that could bene fit the total supply chain. The resulting optimal policy resembles the postponement strategy. We find that information sharing together with order postponement improves the supply chain performance, even though the order variability may amplify in some cases.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 797
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   An ARIMA supply chain model [J].
Gilbert, K .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (02) :305-310
[22]  
Graves S. C., 1999, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V1, P50, DOI 10.1287/msom.1.1.50
[23]  
GRAVES SC, 1986, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V266, P9
[25]  
Gullu R, 1996, NAV RES LOG, V43, P289, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199603)43:2<289::AID-NAV8>3.0.CO
[26]  
2-6
[27]  
HAUSMAN WH, 1969, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V16, pB93
[28]   MODELING THE EVOLUTION OF DEMAND FORECASTS WITH APPLICATION TO SAFETY STOCK ANALYSIS IN PRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS [J].
HEATH, DC ;
JACKSON, PL .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (03) :17-30
[29]   Approximate solutions of a dynamic forecast-inventory model [J].
Iida, Tetsuo ;
Zipkin, Paul H. .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 8 (04) :407-425
[30]   OPTIMALITY OF MYOPIC INVENTORY POLICIES FOR CERTAIN DEPENDENT DEMAND PROCESSES [J].
JOHNSON, GD ;
THOMPSON, HE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1975, 21 (11) :1303-1307