Prospective evaluation of soft tissue masses and sarcomas using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

被引:60
作者
Lucas, JD
O'Doherty, MJ
Cronin, BF
Marsden, PK
Lodge, MA
McKee, PH
Smith, MA
机构
[1] United Med & Dent Sch Guys & St Thomas Hosp, St Thomas Hosp, Guys & St Thomas Clin PET Ctr, St Thomas Soft Tissue Tumour Unit, London, England
[2] United Med & Dent Sch Guys & St Thomas Hosp, St Thomas Hosp, Dept Histopathol, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01090.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The differentiation of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) from benign masses is difficult owing to their clinical and radiological similarities. Accurate staging is hindered by the large number of sites at which metastases may be found. This study examined the value of whole-body [F-18]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in patients presenting with soft tissue masses. Methods: Thirty patients with a soft tissue mass suspected to be malignant were evaluated with FDG PET. The images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively for uptake of FDG to determine whether benign lesions could be differentiated from malignant tumours, and for the presence of metastases. Results: Thirty-one masses were removed from 30 patients; 12 were benign and 19 were malignant STSs. Using qualitative assessment of the FDG PET images, all the high-grade STSs (n = 12) were correctly identified, but low-grade STS (n = 7) could not be differentiated from a benign lesion. Using a quantification assessment, there was a 95 per cent sensitivity and a 75 per cent specificity in diagnosing STS. Three patients had metastases at presentation; two were correctly identified by FDG PET. Conclusion: FDG PET has a role in distinguishing high-grade STS from low-grade or benign STS and may have a role in staging malignant tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 556
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ADLER LP, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P1508
[2]   GRADING LIPOSARCOMAS WITH PET USING [F-18] FDG [J].
ADLER, LP ;
BLAIR, HF ;
WILLIAMS, RP ;
PATHRIA, MN ;
MAKLEY, JT ;
JOYCE, MJ ;
ALKAISI, N ;
MIRALDI, F .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (06) :960-962
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SOFT TISSUE TUMORS
[4]  
BITRAN JD, 1978, CANCER, V42, P1760, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197810)42:4<1760::AID-CNCR2820420414>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-8
[6]   Does magnetic resonance imaging make a difference for patients with musculoskeletal sarcoma? [J].
Bloem, JL ;
vanderWoude, HJ ;
Geirnaerdt, M ;
Hogendoorn, PCW ;
Taminiau, AHM ;
Hermans, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (832) :327-337
[7]   Variable management of soft tissue sarcoma: regional audit with implications for specialist care [J].
Clasby, R ;
Tilling, K ;
Smith, MA ;
Fletcher, CDM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (12) :1692-1696
[8]  
Eary JF, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P1215
[9]  
Gambhir SS, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P1428
[10]  
Garcia JR, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P1476