Acute Mortality in Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Echocardiography With and Without an Ultrasound Contrast Agent (Multicenter Registry Results in 4,300,966 Consecutive Patients)

被引:144
作者
Main, Michael L. [1 ]
Ryan, Amy C. [2 ]
Davis, Teresa E. [2 ]
Albano, Maureen P. [3 ]
Kusnetzky, Lisa L. [1 ]
Hibberd, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO USA
[2] Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC USA
[3] Lantheus Med Imaging, N Billerica, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
We sought to define acute mortality in a large multicenter cohort of hospitalized patients undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography with and without use of an ultrasound contrast agent. Although the United States Food and Drug Administration recently relaxed the issued warnings for perflutren-containing ultrasound contrast agents on May 13, 2008, concerns still exist regarding the safety of these compounds, particularly in critically ill patients. A retrospective analysis was performed using the Premier Perspective Database. Patients undergoing echocardiography during hospitalization were separated into those performed without contrast enhancement and those performed with perflutren lipid microsphere (PLM) injectable suspension contrast agent (Definity, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, Massachusetts). Vital status within I day of the echocardiogram was available for all patients using hospital billing data. Between January 1, 2002 and October 31, 2007, 4,300,966 patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography at rest during hospitalization (unenhanced studies n = 4,242,712 and contrast-enhanced studies n = 58,254). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare 24-hour mortality, controlling for case mix and clinical covariates; 1-day mortality rates were 1.08% (n = 45,789 deaths) for patients undergoing noncontrast studies and 1.06% (n = 616 deaths) for patients undergoing contrast-enhanced examinations (p = 0.613). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in patients undergoing an echocardiogram, patients receiving PLM injectable suspension contrast agent were 24% less likely to die within I-day than patients not receiving a contrast agent (adjusted odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.82). In conclusion, acute crude mortality was not increased in patients receiving PLM injectable suspension contrast agent. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with patients not receiving a contrast agent, administration of PLM injectable suspension contrast agent during echocardiography was associated with a 24% decreased risk of mortality. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. (Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:1742-1746)
引用
收藏
页码:1742 / 1746
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
AVERILL RF, 2005, WHAT ARE APR DRGS IN
[2]
Averill Richard F, 2002, J AHIMA, V73, P46
[3]
Product safety compromises patient safety (an unjustified black box warning on ultrasound contrast agents by the Food and Drug administration) [J].
Grayburn, Paul A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 101 (06) :892-893
[4]
Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: Comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Hundley, WG ;
Kizilbash, AM ;
Afridi, I ;
Franco, F ;
Peshock, RM ;
Grayburn, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (05) :1426-1432
[5]
Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonics for assessment of left ventricular function in mechanically ventilated patients [J].
Kornbluth, M ;
Liang, DH ;
Brown, P ;
Gessford, E ;
Schnittger, I .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 140 (02) :291-296
[6]
Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent - Results in 18,671 consecutive studies [J].
Kusnetzky, Lisa L. ;
Khalid, Adnan ;
Khumri, Taiyeb M. ;
Moe, Tabitha G. ;
Jones, Philip G. ;
Main, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (17) :1704-1706
[7]
Thinking outside the "Box" - The ultrasound contrast controversy [J].
Main, Michael L. ;
Goldman, Jonathan H. ;
Grayburn, Paul A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (25) :2434-2437
[8]
Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography - A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Malm, S ;
Frigstad, S ;
Sagberg, E ;
Larsson, H ;
Skjaerpe, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (05) :1030-1035
[9]
Contrast echocardiography: Current and future applications [J].
Mulvagh, SL ;
DeMaria, AN ;
Feinstein, SB ;
Burns, PN ;
Kaul, S ;
Miller, JG ;
Monaghan, M ;
Porter, TR ;
Shaw, LJ ;
Villanueva, FS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2000, 13 (04) :331-342
[10]
Contrast administration reduces interobserver variability in determination of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and good baseline endocardial border delineation [J].
Nayyar, Sunil ;
Magalski, Anthony ;
Khumri, Taiyeb M. ;
Idupulapati, Madhuri ;
Stoner, Casey N. ;
Kusnetzky, Lisa L. ;
Coggins, Tina R. ;
Morris, Becky A. ;
Main, Michael L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (08) :1110-1114