Growth effects of shifting from a graduated-rate tax system to a flat tax

被引:22
作者
Cassou, SP
Lansing, KJ
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Fed Reserve Bank San Francisco, Dept Res, San Francisco, CA 94120 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ei/cbh054
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We compute the growth effects of adopting a revenue-neutral flat tax for both a human capital-based endogenous growth model and a standard neoclassical growth model. Long-run growth effects are decomposed into the parts attributable to the flattening of the marginal tax schedule, the full expensing of physical-capital investment, and the elimination of double taxation of business income. The most important element of the reform is the flattening of the marginal tax schedule. Without this element, the combined effects of the other parts of the reform can actually reduce long-run growth. In the years immediately following the reform, the transition dynamics implied by the neoclassical growth model are quite similar to that of the endogenous growth model.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 213
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
CLOTFELTER CT, 1991, EC CHALLENGES HIGHER, P17
[12]  
DAVIES J, 1991, NAT BUR EC, P163
[13]   THE EFFECTS OF FACTOR TAXATION IN A 2-SECTOR MODEL OF ENDOGENOUS GROWTH [J].
DEVEREUX, MB ;
LOVE, DRF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1994, 27 (03) :509-536
[14]  
Dupor B, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P340
[15]  
EATON J, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P705
[16]   International evidence on investment and fundamentals [J].
Eberly, JC .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 41 (06) :1055-1078
[17]  
EISSA N, 1996, TAX POLICY EC, V10, P119
[18]  
Friedman M, 1962, Capitalism and Freedom
[19]   Flat-Rate Taxes, Government Spending on Education, and Growth [J].
Glomm, Gerhard ;
Ravikumar, B. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 1998, 1 (01) :306-325
[20]  
GOUVEIA M, 1994, NATL TAX J, V47, P317