Selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy

被引:23
作者
Golledge, J [1 ]
Ellis, M [1 ]
Sabharwal, T [1 ]
Sikdar, T [1 ]
Davies, AH [1 ]
Greenhalgh, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Charing Cross Hosp, Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Surg & Radiol, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70184-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was the definition of the duplex scan parameters that best select patients for carotid endarterectomy. Methods: This study was set in a regional vascular unit. Duplex scanning and angiography were performed prospectively on 50 patients who were symptomatic (100 carotid bifurcation) to identify the most accurate and sensitive duplex scan criteria to identify an 80% to 99% stenosis according to the European Carotid Symptomatic Trial. With data from the European Carotid Symptomatic Trial, we estimated the effect of three different approaches used to select patients for carotid endarterectomy. The first approach was the selection of patients for carotid surgery on the basis of duplex scanning alone with the most accurate duplex scan criteria (approach I). The second approach was the selection of patients for carotid surgery on the basis of duplex scanning alone with a 100% sensitive duplex scan criteria (approach II). The third approach was the selection of patients for angiography with duplex scanning (100% sensitive criteria) and then the use of angiography to define which patients should undergo surgery (approach III). Results: All three approaches appeared to have a similar potential in stroke reduction. However, approach I, which minimized the number of patients who underwent surgery (19% less than approach II) or invasive imaging (65% less than approach III), appeared to be the most appropriate. Conclusion: These data support the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy on the basis of duplex scanning alone. The duplex scan criteria should be validated against angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS - WHATS IN THE MEASUREMENT [J].
HOBSON, RW ;
STRANDNESS, DE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 18 (06) :1069-1070
[12]   DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS - EFFICACY OF VARIOUS DOPPLER VELOCITY PARAMETERS [J].
HUNINK, MGM ;
POLAK, JF ;
BARLAN, MM ;
OLEARY, DH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (03) :619-625
[13]  
MACKEY WC, 1989, J VASC SURG, V10, P432
[14]   BLINDED-READER COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AND DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR CAROTID-ARTERY BIFURCATION STENOSIS [J].
MITTL, RL ;
BRODERICK, M ;
CARPENTER, JP ;
GOLDBERG, HI ;
LISTRUD, J ;
MISHKIN, MM ;
BERKOWITZ, HD ;
ATLAS, SW .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (01) :4-10
[15]   CORRELATION OF NORTH-AMERICAN SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY TRIAL (NASCET) ANGIOGRAPHIC DEFINITION OF 70-PERCENT TO 99-PERCENT INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS WITH DUPLEX SCANNING [J].
MONETA, GL ;
EDWARDS, JM ;
CHITWOOD, RW ;
TAYLOR, LM ;
LEE, RW ;
CUMMINGS, CA ;
PORTER, JM ;
THIELE, B ;
HOBSON, R ;
RICOTTA, J ;
HUNINK, M ;
CUNHA, SS ;
BARNES, R .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 17 (01) :152-159
[16]   REAPPRAISAL OF DUPLEX CRITERIA TO ASSESS SIGNIFICANT CAROTID STENOSIS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO REPORTS FROM THE NORTH-AMERICAN SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY TRIAL AND THE EUROPEAN CAROTID SURGERY TRIAL [J].
NEALE, ML ;
CHAMBERS, JL ;
KELLY, AT ;
CONNARD, S ;
LAWTON, MA ;
ROCHE, J ;
APPLEBERG, M .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 20 (04) :642-649
[17]   PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CAROTID BIFURCATION - CAN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AND DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY REPLACE CONTRAST ARTERIOGRAPHY [J].
PATEL, MR ;
KUNTZ, KM ;
KLUFAS, RA ;
KIM, D ;
KRAMER, J ;
POLAK, JF ;
SKILLMAN, JJ ;
WHITTEMORE, AD ;
EDELMAN, RR ;
KENT, KC .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (10) :1753-1758
[18]   EQUIVALENCE OF MEASUREMENTS OF CAROTID STENOSIS - A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS ON 1001 ANGIOGRAMS [J].
ROTHWELL, PM ;
GIBSON, RJ ;
SLATTERY, J ;
SELLAR, RJ ;
WARLOW, CP .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (12) :2435-2439
[19]   IMAGING CAROTID STENOSIS [J].
STEVENS, JM .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 50 (12) :821-822
[20]  
TAYLOR DW, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V325, P445