Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography

被引:490
作者
Kerlikowske, K
Grady, D
Barclay, J
Sickles, EA
Ernster, V
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,SAN FRANCISCO,CA
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT RADIOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1996年 / 276卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.276.1.33
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To determine factors that influence the sensitivity of modern first screening mammography. Design.-Cross-sectional. Setting.-Nine counties in northern California. Participants.-A total of 28 271 women aged 30 years and older referred for first screening mammography to the Mobile Mammography Screening Program of the University of California, San Francisco, from April 1985 to March 1 992, of whom 238 were subsequently diagnosed as having breast cancer. Measurements.-Breast cancer risk profile, 2 standard mammographic views per breast, breast density, and follow-up of abnormal and normal mammography by contacting women's physicians and by linkage to the regional Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registry to determine the occurrence of any invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Results tumor registry to determine the occurrence of any invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Results.-For women aged 50 years and older, the sensitivity of first screening mammography was relatively high and decreased slightly with increasing length of follow-up after mammography: 98.5% for 7 months of follow-up, 93.2% for 13 months, and 85.7% for 25 months. Sensitivity was higher among women aged 50 years and older when breast density was primarily fatty rather than primarily dense (98.4% vs 83.7%; P<.01). For women younger than 50 years, the sensitivity of first screening mammography also decreased with increasing length of follow-up but was significantly lower than for older women: 87.5% for 7 months of follow-up, 83.6% for 13 months, and 71.4% for 25 months. For women younger than 50 years, breast density did not affect the sensitivity of mammography (81.8% for those with primarily fatty breasts vs 85.4% for those with primarily dense breasts) and was lower among those with a family history of breast cancer (68.8%). Conclusions.-The sensitivity of modem mammography is highest among women aged 50 years and older who have primarily fatty breast density. Sensitivity is lowest among women younger than 50 years and particularly low when the time between screenings is about 2 years or when women have a family history of breast cancer, possibly because of rapid tumor growth.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 1982, POL STAT GUID MAMM
[2]   FOLLOW-UP OF 2 TREATMENT MODALITIES FOR DUCTAL CANCER INSITU OF THE BREAST [J].
ARNESSON, LG ;
SMEDS, S ;
FAGERBERG, G ;
GRONTOFT, O .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (07) :672-675
[3]   BREAST MAMMOGRAPHIC PATTERN - A CONCATENATION OF CONFOUNDING AND BREAST-CANCER RISK-FACTORS [J].
BARTOW, SA ;
PATHAK, DR ;
METTLER, FA ;
KEY, CR ;
PIKE, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (08) :813-819
[5]   ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BIRD, RE ;
WALLACE, TW ;
YANKASKAS, BC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :613-617
[6]   BREAST-CANCER AFTER A NEGATIVE SCREEN - FOLLOW-UP OF WOMEN PARTICIPATING IN THE DOM SCREENING-PROGRAM [J].
BREKELMANS, CTM ;
COLLETTE, HJA ;
COLLETTE, C ;
FRACHEBOUD, J ;
DEWAARD, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (4-5) :893-895
[7]   SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY IN COMMUNITY PRACTICE - POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ABNORMAL FINDINGS AND YIELD OF FOLLOW-UP DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES [J].
BROWN, ML ;
HOUN, F ;
SICKLES, EA ;
KESSLER, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (06) :1373-1377
[8]   INTERVAL BREAST CANCERS IN THE SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM OF BRITISH-COLUMBIA - ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION [J].
BURHENNE, HJ ;
BURHENNE, LW ;
GOLDBERG, F ;
HISLOP, TG ;
WORTH, AJ ;
REBBECK, PM ;
KAN, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (05) :1067-1071
[9]   FAMILY HISTORY, AGE, AND RISK OF FATAL BREAST-CANCER [J].
CALLE, EE ;
MARTIN, LM ;
THUN, MJ ;
MIRACLE, HL ;
HEATH, CW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (09) :675-681
[10]  
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, 1994, CAN GUID CLIN PREV H