Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography

被引:490
作者
Kerlikowske, K
Grady, D
Barclay, J
Sickles, EA
Ernster, V
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,SAN FRANCISCO,CA
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT RADIOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1996年 / 276卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.276.1.33
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To determine factors that influence the sensitivity of modern first screening mammography. Design.-Cross-sectional. Setting.-Nine counties in northern California. Participants.-A total of 28 271 women aged 30 years and older referred for first screening mammography to the Mobile Mammography Screening Program of the University of California, San Francisco, from April 1985 to March 1 992, of whom 238 were subsequently diagnosed as having breast cancer. Measurements.-Breast cancer risk profile, 2 standard mammographic views per breast, breast density, and follow-up of abnormal and normal mammography by contacting women's physicians and by linkage to the regional Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registry to determine the occurrence of any invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Results tumor registry to determine the occurrence of any invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Results.-For women aged 50 years and older, the sensitivity of first screening mammography was relatively high and decreased slightly with increasing length of follow-up after mammography: 98.5% for 7 months of follow-up, 93.2% for 13 months, and 85.7% for 25 months. Sensitivity was higher among women aged 50 years and older when breast density was primarily fatty rather than primarily dense (98.4% vs 83.7%; P<.01). For women younger than 50 years, the sensitivity of first screening mammography also decreased with increasing length of follow-up but was significantly lower than for older women: 87.5% for 7 months of follow-up, 83.6% for 13 months, and 71.4% for 25 months. For women younger than 50 years, breast density did not affect the sensitivity of mammography (81.8% for those with primarily fatty breasts vs 85.4% for those with primarily dense breasts) and was lower among those with a family history of breast cancer (68.8%). Conclusions.-The sensitivity of modem mammography is highest among women aged 50 years and older who have primarily fatty breast density. Sensitivity is lowest among women younger than 50 years and particularly low when the time between screenings is about 2 years or when women have a family history of breast cancer, possibly because of rapid tumor growth.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY BY AGE AND FAMILY HISTORY OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
KERLIKOWSKE, K ;
GRADY, D ;
BARCLAY, J ;
SICKLES, EA ;
EATON, A ;
ERNSTER, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (20) :2444-2450
[22]  
LAGIOS MD, 1989, CANCER, V63, P618, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890215)63:4<618::AID-CNCR2820630403>3.0.CO
[23]  
2-J
[24]   IMPROVEMENT IN MAMMOGRAPHY INTERPRETATION SKILLS IN A COMMUNITY RADIOLOGY PRACTICE AFTER DEDICATED TEACHING COURSES - 2-YEAR MEDICAL AUDIT OF 38,633 CASES [J].
LINVER, MN ;
PASTER, SB ;
ROSENBERG, RD ;
KEY, CR ;
STIDLEY, CA ;
KING, WV .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (01) :39-43
[25]   CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH FAILURE TO DETECT BREAST-CANCER BY MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
MA, L ;
FISHELL, E ;
WRIGHT, B ;
HANNA, W ;
ALLAN, S ;
BOYD, NF .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1992, 84 (10) :781-785
[26]   BREAST-CANCER DETECTION GUIDELINES FOR WOMEN AGED 40 TO 49 YEARS - RATIONALE FOR THE AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY REAFFIRMATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS [J].
METTLIN, C ;
SMART, CR .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1994, 44 (04) :248-255
[27]   COMPUTERIZED FOLLOW-UP OF ABNORMALITIES DETECTED AT MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING [J].
MONTICCIOLO, DL ;
SICKLES, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (04) :751-753
[28]   BREAST-CANCER - AGE-SPECIFIC GROWTH-RATES AND SCREENING STRATEGIES [J].
MOSKOWITZ, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (01) :37-41
[29]  
PAGE DL, 1982, CANCER, V49, P751, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19820215)49:4<751::AID-CNCR2820490426>3.0.CO
[30]  
2-Y