Use of vena cava filters in pediatric trauma patients: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank

被引:33
作者
Cook, A
Shackford, S
Osler, T
Rogers, F
Sartorelli, K
Littenberg, B
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Fletcher Allen Hlth Care, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2005年 / 59卷 / 05期
关键词
pediatric trauma; deep venous thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; inferior vena cava filter;
D O I
10.1097/01.ta.0000196692.40475.61
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) in high-risk adult trauma patients is a well-described intervention for prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism (PE). Few data exist regarding the use of VCFs in pediatric trauma. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using the National Trauma Data Bank of the American College of Surgeons. Patients 17 years old or younger were included. Data regarding demographics, injuries, hospitalization, survival, and treating institution were analyzed. The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), PE, and VCF placement were calculated. Odds ratios (ORs) for predictors of VCF placement were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Results: There were 116,357 pediatric patients in the National Trauma Data Bank. VCFs were placed in 214 (0.18%) patients. VCF patients had longer mean hospital (23.99 vs. 4.12 days) and intensive care unit stays (13.65 vs. 1.12 days) and more severe injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 30.89 vs. 9.04) than those without VCFs. Sixty-five patients had DVT, and PE was diagnosed in 28 patients, representing 0.06% and 0.02% of the cohort, respectively. University-associated teaching hospitals placed 72.4% (95% confidence interval, 65.9-78.3%) of VCFs and Level I trauma centers placed 46.3% (95% confidence interval, 39.4-53.2%) of VCFs. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of VCF use were DVT (OR, 33.13), spinal cord injury (OR, 15.28), probability of survival (OR, 10.52), severe femur fracture (OR, 3.39), increasing age (OR, 1.99), ISS (OR, 1.05), intensive care unit stay (OR, 1.04), and length of stay (OR, 1.02). Higher Glasgow Coma Scale score decreased the likelihood of VCF use (OR, 0.87). Conclusion: Placement of VCFs in pediatric trauma patients is uncommon and is associated with several characteristics of the patient, the injury, and the treating institution. Long-term VCF efficacy in pediatric trauma is not known, and application of VCFs in these patients requires further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1120
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[31]   Statewide, population-based, time-series analysis of the frequency and outcome of pulmonary embolus in 318,554 trauma patients [J].
TuttleNewhall, JE ;
Rutledge, R ;
Hultman, CS ;
Fakhry, SM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (01) :90-99
[32]   Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in pediatric trauma [J].
Vavilala, MS ;
Nathens, AB ;
Jurkovich, GJ ;
Mackenzie, E ;
Rivara, FP .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 52 (05) :922-927
[33]   DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS IN CHILDREN FOLLOWING TRAUMA - A REPORT OF 2 CASES [J].
ZIONTS, LE ;
MCCAMPBELL, EJ ;
SZENTFULOPI, T ;
GOODMAN, RM ;
HARVEY, JP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 65 (06) :839-840