Is my antibody-staining specific? How to deal with pitfalls of immunohistochemistry

被引:133
作者
Fritschy, Jean-Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Pharmacol & Toxicol, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
histology; immunofluorescence; immunoglobulin; light microscopy; tissue fixation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06552.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and versatile method widely used to investigate the cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the brain. It is based on the high affinity and selectivity of antibodies for a single epitope. However, it is now recognized that the specificity of antibodies needs to be tested in control experiments to avoid false-positive results due to non-specific binding to tissue components or recognition of epitopes shared by several molecules. This 'Technical Spotlight' discusses other pitfalls, which are often overlooked, although they can strongly influence the outcome of immunohistochemical experiments. It also recapitulates the minimal set of information that should be provided in scientific publications to allow proper evaluation and replication of immunohistochemical experiments. In particular, tissue fixation and processing can have a strong impact on antigenicity by producing conformational changes to the epitopes, limiting their accessibility (epitope masking) or generating high non-specific background. These effects are illustrated for an immunoperoxidase staining experiment with three antibodies differing in susceptibility to fixation, using tissue from mice processed under identical conditions, except for slight variations in tissue fixation. In these examples, specific immunostaining can be abolished depending on fixation strength, or detected only after prolonged postfixation. As a consequence, antibody characterization in immunohistochemistry should include their susceptibility towards fixation and determination of the optimal conditions for their use.
引用
收藏
页码:2365 / 2370
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Perisomatic inhibition [J].
Freund, Tamas F. ;
Katona, Istvan .
NEURON, 2007, 56 (01) :33-42
[2]
SEROTONERGIC CONTROL OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS VIA LOCAL INHIBITORY INTERNEURONS [J].
FREUND, TF ;
GULYAS, AI ;
ACSADY, L ;
GORCS, T ;
TOTH, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (21) :8501-8505
[3]
GABA(A)-RECEPTOR HETEROGENEITY IN THE ADULT-RAT BRAIN - DIFFERENTIAL REGIONAL AND CELLULAR-DISTRIBUTION OF 7 MAJOR SUBUNITS [J].
FRITSCHY, JM ;
MOHLER, H .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1995, 359 (01) :154-194
[4]
Fritschy JM, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V390, P194
[5]
Immunofluorescence in brain sections:: simultaneous detection of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in identified neurons [J].
Gasser, Edith M. Schneider ;
Straub, Carolin J. ;
Panzanelli, Patrizia ;
Weinmann, Oliver ;
Sassoe-Pognetto, Marco ;
Fritschy, Jean-Marc .
NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2006, 1 (04) :1887-1897
[6]
Specificity of immunoreactions: The importance of testing specificity in each method [J].
Lorincz, Andrea ;
Nusser, Zoltan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (37) :9083-9086
[7]
DIFFERENTIAL KINETICS FOR IMMUNONEUTRALIZATION OF CIRCULATING GASTRIN BY GASTRIN MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY AND ITS FAB(1) FRAGMENT IN RATS [J].
OHNING, GV ;
WONG, HC ;
WALSH, JH .
PEPTIDES, 1994, 15 (03) :417-423
[8]
Antibodies as valuable neuroscience research tools versus reagents of mass distraction [J].
Rhodes, Kenneth J. ;
Trimmer, James S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (31) :8017-8020
[9]
An open letter to our readers on the use of antibodies [J].
Saper, CB .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2005, 493 (04) :477-478
[10]
Alteration of GABAergic synapses and gephyrin clusters in the thalamic reticular nucleus of GABAA receptor α3 subunit-null mice [J].
Studer, Remo ;
von Boehmer, Lotta ;
Haenggi, Tatjana ;
Schweizer, Claude ;
Benke, Dietmar ;
Rudolph, Uwe ;
Fritschy, Jean-Marc .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 24 (05) :1307-1315