250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections Safety and Feasibility

被引:293
作者
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Moser, A. James [3 ]
Boone, Brian A. [1 ]
Bartlett, David L. [1 ]
Zenati, Mazen [2 ]
Zeh, Herbert J., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Div GI Surg Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[3] Inst Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Dept Surg BIDMC, Boston, MA USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgery; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic; pancreaticoduodenectomy; robotic surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; SINGLE-INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; 1423; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMIES; FISTULA; SURGERY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Computer-assisted robotic surgery allows complex resections and anastomotic reconstructions to be performed with nearly identical standards to open surgery. We applied this technology to a variety of pancreatic resections to assess the safety, feasibility, versatility, and reliability of this technology. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective database of robotic pancreatic resections at a single institution between August 2008 and November 2012 was performed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 250 consecutive robotic pancreatic resections were analyzed; pancreaticoduodenectomy (132), distal pancreatectomy (83), central pancreatectomy (13), pancreatic enucleation (10), total pancreatectomy (5), Appleby resection (4), and Frey procedure (3). Thirty-day and 90-day mortality was 0.8% and 2.0%. Rate of Clavien 3 and 4 complications was 14% and 6%. The International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula grade C fistula rate was 4%. Mean operative time for the 2 most common procedures was 529 +/- 103 minutes for pancreaticoduodenectomy and 257 +/- 93 minutes for distal pancreatectomy. Continuous improvement in operative times was observed over the course of the experience. Conversion to open procedure was required in 16 patients (6%) (11 with pancreaticoduodenectomy, 2 with distal pancreatectomy, 2 with central pancreatectomy, 1 with total pancreatectomy) for failure to progress (14) and bleeding (2). Conclusions: This represents to our knowledge the largest series of robotic pancreatic resections. Safety and feasibility metrics including the low incidence of conversion support the robustness of this platform and suggest no unanticipated risks inherent to this new technology. By defining these early outcome metrics, this report begins to establish a framework for comparative effectiveness studies of this platform.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 562
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Central Pancreatectomy: Technique and Outcomes [J].
Abood, Gerard J. ;
Can, M. Fatih ;
Daouadi, Mustapha ;
Huss, Harold T. ;
Steve, Jennifer Y. ;
Ramalingam, Lekshmi ;
Stang, Michael ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Zeh, Herbert J., III ;
Moser, A. James .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (05) :1002-1008
[2]   Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association [J].
Addeo, Pietro ;
Delpero, Jean Robert ;
Paye, Francois ;
Oussoultzoglou, Elie ;
Fuchshuber, Pascal R. ;
Sauvanet, Alain ;
Sa Cunha, Antonio ;
Le Treut, Yves Patrice ;
Adham, Mustapha ;
Mabrut, Jean-Yves ;
Chiche, Laurence ;
Bachellier, Philippe .
HPB, 2014, 16 (01) :46-55
[3]   Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 1 Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations [J].
Barkun, Jeffrey S. ;
Aronson, Jeffrey K. ;
Feldman, Liane S. ;
Maddern, Guy J. ;
Strasberg, Steven M. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9695) :1089-1096
[4]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[5]  
Cameron JL, 2006, ANN SURG, V244, P10, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
[6]   The usefulness of a grading system for complications resulting from pancreatic resections: A single center experience [J].
Casadei R. ;
Ricci C. ;
Pezzilli R. ;
Morselli-Labate A.M. ;
Calculli L. ;
D'Ambra M. ;
Monari F. ;
Taffurelli G. ;
Minni F. .
Updates in Surgery, 2011, 63 (2) :97-102
[7]   Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Robot-assisted and Standard Laparoscopic Prostatectomy as Alternatives to Open Radical Prostatectomy for Treatment of Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment from the Perspective of the UK National Health Service [J].
Close, Andrew ;
Robertson, Clare ;
Rushton, Stephen ;
Shirley, Mark ;
Vale, Luke ;
Ramsay, Craig ;
Pickard, Robert .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (03) :361-369
[8]   Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique [J].
Daouadi, Mustapha ;
Zureikat, Amer H. ;
Zenati, Mazen S. ;
Choudry, Haroon ;
Tsung, Alan ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Hughes, Steven J. ;
Lee, Ken K. ;
Moser, A. James ;
Zeh, Herbert J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) :128-132
[9]   Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome [J].
Denbo, Jason W. ;
Orr, W. Shannon ;
Zarzaur, Ben L. ;
Behrman, Stephen W. .
HPB, 2012, 14 (09) :589-593
[10]   Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery - A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
DeOliveira, Michelle L. ;
Winter, Jordan M. ;
Schafer, Markus ;
Cunningham, Steven C. ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Clavien, Pierre-Alain .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (06) :931-939