Seismic Overstrength in Braced Frames of Modular Steel Buildings

被引:110
作者
Annan, C. D. [1 ]
Youssef, M. A. [1 ]
El Naggar, M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Modular Steel Building; Braced Frame; Seismic Design; Structural Overstrength; Ductility; Capacity Design; Nonlinear Pushover Analysis; DESIGN; DUCTILITY;
D O I
10.1080/13632460802212576
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The seismic behavior factor, R, is a critical parameter in contemporary seismic design. In the 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada, the R factor consists of ductility related force modification factor, Rd, and overstrength-related force modification factor, Ro. The choice of these factors for design depends on the structural system type. In this investigation, typical braced frames of Modular Steel Buildings (MSBs) are designed and modeled. Nonlinear static pushover analyses are conducted to study the inelastic behavior of these frames. Structural overstrength resulting from redistribution of internal forces in the inelastic range, design assumptions, and strain hardening behavior of steel and displacement ductility are evaluated and their relationships with some key response parameters are assessed. The results show that the reserve strength of MSB-braced systems is greater than that prescribed by the Canadian code for regular braced systems. It also appears that R depends on building height, contrary to what has been prescribed in many seismic design codes. It is concluded that some unique detailing requirements of MSBs need to be considered during design to eliminate undesirable seismic response.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] BRUNEAU M, 1998, DUCTILE DESIGN STEEL, P381
  • [12] Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings
    Elnashai, AS
    Mwafy, AM
    [J]. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS, 2002, 11 (05): : 329 - 351
  • [13] Izzuddin B.A., 1991, Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Framed Structures
  • [14] JAIN AK, 1978, 78R6 UMEE U MICH DEP
  • [15] Khatib IF, 1988, UCB/EERC-88/01
  • [16] Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames
    Kim, JK
    Choi, H
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (02) : 285 - 300
  • [17] Seismic force modification factors for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada
    Mitchell, D
    Tremblay, R
    Karacabeyli, E
    Paultre, P
    Saatcioglu, M
    Anderson, DL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2003, 30 (02) : 308 - 327
  • [18] DUCTILITY AND OVERSTRENGTH IN SEISMIC DESIGN OF REINFORCED-CONCRETE STRUCTURES
    MITCHELL, D
    PAULTRE, P
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1994, 21 (06) : 1049 - 1060
  • [19] Osteraas J., 1989, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V5, P51, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1585511
  • [20] Accounting for overstrength in seismic design of steel structures
    Rahgozar, MA
    Humar, JL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1998, 25 (01) : 1 - 15