Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution

被引:85
作者
Broch, Stine Wamberg [1 ]
Strange, Niels [1 ]
Jacobsen, Jette B. [1 ]
Wilson, Kerrie A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate Change, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Preference modelling; Choice experiments; Biodiversity; Groundwater; Recreation; Hunting; TO-PAY; NONMARKET VALUATION; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; RECREATION VALUES; DISTANCE-DECAY; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; ADOPTION; DESIGN; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The supply of ecosystem goods and services is spatially heterogeneous and the provision of such goods and services is also influenced by landowners' willingness to provide. This is particularly the case in countries such as Denmark where many properties are privately owned. However, little attention has previously been given to the relationship between farmers' willingness to provide a good or service and the spatial heterogeneity associated with their demand. In this study farmers' willingness to participate in afforestation contracts are investigated using a choice experiment of various contracts with the purpose to provide: groundwater protection, biodiversity conservation or recreation. We employ a random parameter logit model to analyse the relationship between farmers' preferences for afforestation purposes and the spatial variables; groundwater interests, species richness, human population density, forest cover and hunting. The results show that increasing human population density significantly increases farmers' required compensation with respect to recreational activities. Furthermore, there is a significant effect of hunting which decreases compensation required by the farmers to enter an afforestation project. The share of groundwater and forest cover does not significantly influence preferences. We conclude that spatial variations should be considered when designing conservation policies (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 86
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[2]   Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology [J].
Balmford, Andrew ;
Cowling, Richard M. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :692-695
[3]  
Barrett CB, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P497, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0497:CTBAWI]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Valuing irrigation water using a choice experiment: an 'individual status quo' modelling of farm specific water scarcity [J].
Barton, David N. ;
Bergland, Olvar .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 15 :321-340
[6]   The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Georgiou, Stavros ;
Lake, Iain .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) :450-460
[7]   DOES THE NUMBER OF CHOICE SETS MATTER? RESULTS FROM A WEB SURVEY APPLYING A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT [J].
Bech, Mickael ;
Kjaer, Trine ;
Lauridsen, Jorgen .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 20 (03) :273-286
[8]   An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: Improving communication between authorities and owners [J].
Boon, TE ;
Meilby, H ;
Thorsen, BJ .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2004, 19 :45-55
[9]   Using Choice Experiments to Investigate the Policy Relevance of Heterogeneity in Farmer Agri-Environmental Contract Preferences [J].
Broch, Stine Wamberg ;
Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 51 (04) :561-581
[10]   Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment [J].
Brouwer, Roy ;
Martin-Ortega, Julia ;
Berbel, Julio .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2010, 86 (03) :552-568