Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons and Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons Encode the Difference between Reward and Aversive Events at Different Epochs of Probabilistic Classical Conditioning Trials

被引:210
作者
Joshua, Mati [1 ,2 ]
Adler, Avital [1 ,2 ]
Mitelman, Rea [1 ,2 ]
Vaadia, Eilon [1 ,2 ]
Bergman, Hagai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Dept Physiol, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Interdisciplinary Ctr Neural Computat, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Eric Roland Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
primate; basal ganglia; spike train; reinforcement; substantia nigra; striatum;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3839-08.2008
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Midbrain dopaminergic neurons (DANs) typically increase their discharge rate in response to appetitive predictive cues and outcomes, whereas striatal cholinergic tonically active interneurons (TANs) decrease their rate. This may indicate that the activity of TANs and DANsis negatively correlated and that TANs can broaden the basal ganglia reinforcement teaching signal, for instance by encoding worse than predicted events. We studied the activity of 106 DANs and 180 TANs of two monkeys recorded during the performance of a classical conditioning task with cues predicting the probability of food, neutral, and air puff outcomes. DANs responded to all cues with elevations of discharge rate, whereas TANs depressed their discharge rate. Nevertheless, although dopaminergic responses to appetitive cues were larger than their responses to neutral or aversive cues, the TAN responses were more similar. Both TANs and DANs responded faster to an air puff than to a food outcome; however, DANs responded with a discharge elevation, whereas the TAN responses included major negative and positive deflections. Finally, food versus air puff omission was better encoded by TANs. In terms of the activity of single neurons with distinct responses to the different behavioral events, both DANs and TANs were more strongly modulated by reward than by aversive related events and better reflected the probability of reward than aversive outcome. Thus, TANs and DANs encode the task episodes differentially. The DANs encode mainly the cue and outcome delivery, whereas the TANs mainly encode outcome delivery and omission at termination of the behavioral trial episode.
引用
收藏
页码:11673 / 11684
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons [J].
Fiorillo, CD ;
Tobler, PN ;
Schultz, W .
SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5614) :1898-1902
[12]   By carrot or by stick: Cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism [J].
Frank, MJ ;
Seeberger, LC ;
O'Reilly, RC .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5703) :1940-1943
[13]   A simple indicator of nonstationarity of firing rate in spike trains [J].
Gourevitch, Boris ;
Eggermont, Jos J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 163 (01) :181-187
[14]   THE BASAL GANGLIA AND ADAPTIVE MOTOR CONTROL [J].
GRAYBIEL, AM ;
AOSAKI, T ;
FLAHERTY, AW ;
KIMURA, M .
SCIENCE, 1994, 265 (5180) :1826-1831
[15]   An electrophysiological characterization of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons during differential pavlovian fear conditioning in the awake rabbit [J].
Guarraci, FA ;
Kapp, BS .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 99 (02) :169-179
[16]   Computational models of the basal ganglia: from robots to membranes [J].
Gurney, K ;
Prescott, TJ ;
Wickens, JR ;
Redgrave, P .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2004, 27 (08) :453-459
[17]   Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events [J].
Horvitz, JC .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 96 (04) :651-656
[18]   Quantifying the isolation quality of extracellularly recorded action potentials [J].
Joshua, Mati ;
Elias, Shlomo ;
Levine, Odeya ;
Bergman, Hagai .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 163 (02) :267-282
[19]   Dopamine: generalization and bonuses [J].
Kakade, S ;
Dayan, P .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2002, 15 (4-6) :549-559
[20]   Value representations in the primate striatum during matching behavior [J].
Lau, Brian ;
Glimcher, Paul W. .
NEURON, 2008, 58 (03) :451-463