Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance

被引:76
作者
Claver-Cortes, Enrique [1 ]
Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. [1 ]
Molina-Azorin, Jose F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Dept Business, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
关键词
Organizational structure; Hybrid competitive strategy; Performance; PLS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; EQUATION MODELS; BUSINESS; INNOVATION; ENVIRONMENT; ADVANTAGE; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the characteristics of organizational structure that relate to hybrid competitive strategies. Such strategies seek to obtain higher performance levels by simultaneously emphasizing high differentiation and low-cost levels. In addition, this paper analyzes the mediating role of competitive strategy in the relationship between organizational structure and firm performance. The study examines a sample of large Spanish firms belonging to different sectors. The findings reveal that hybrid competitive strategy influences firm performance positively. Similarly, organizational complexity and the existence of formalization positively influence hybrid competitive strategy, whereas centralization has a negative influence. Organizational structure does not exert a direct influence on performance, but an indirect one, through hybrid competitive strategy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1002
页数:10
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Does the implementation of a combination competitive strategy yield incremental performance benefits? A new perspective from a transition economy in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Acquaah, Moses ;
Yasai-Ardekani, Masoud .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 61 (04) :346-354
[2]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[3]  
AIKEN M, 1980, ACAD MANAGE J, V23, P631, DOI 10.5465/255553
[4]  
Akan O., 2006, J BUS STRAT, V27, P43, DOI DOI 10.1108/02756660610640173
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]  
Barclay D.C., 1995, Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, V2, P285
[7]   Performance implications of aligning CEO functional experiences with competitive strategies [J].
Beal, RM ;
Yasai-Ardekani, M .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (04) :733-762
[8]  
Beal RM, 2000, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V38, P27
[9]   Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change [J].
Becker, MC ;
Lazaric, N ;
Nelson, RR ;
Winter, SG .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2005, 14 (05) :775-791
[10]  
Beckmann C., 2007, Social Work and Society, V5, P78