Tolerance of endorectal balloon in 396 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer

被引:24
作者
Bastasch, MD
Teh, BS
Mai, WY
McGary, JE
Grant, WH
Butler, EB
机构
[1] Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Sect Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2006年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; endorectal balloon; acute rectal toxicity; intensity; modulated radiation therapy;
D O I
10.1097/01.coc.0000195099.26957.63
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: To report patient tolerance and acute anorectal toxicity of an endorectal balloon used for prostate immobilization during 35 daily fractions. Materials and Methods: The records of 396 patients treated for prostate cancer from October 1997 to November 2001 were reviewed. Patients were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Endorectal balloon catheter was inserted daily, inflated with 100 mL of air for immobilizing the prostate gland. Patient and treatment factors were analyzed. Patients received a mean dose of 77 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks with no rectal block. Results: None of the 396 patients halted treatment because of associated ano-rectal toxicity. No patient stated that he would decline to be treated again with rectal balloon. Three of 396 (0.8%) patients required a reduction in the volume of the balloon to 50 mL. Seventeen of 396 (4.3%) patients required Lidocaine jelly with the insertion of balloon. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grades 1 and 2 rectal toxicity occurred in 55/396 (13.9%) and 73/396 (18.4%), respectively. No RTOG grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred. Topical anal medications were prescribed for 46 of 396 (11.6%) patients and antidiarrhea medication for 27 of 396 (6.8%) patients. Of patients with pretreatment anorectal disease, 50% developed rectal toxicities over the 7 weeks. Rectal toxicity occurred most frequently in the third, fourth, fifth, or sixth week; 19.5%, 20.8%, 18.2%, and 16.9%, respectively. The duration of the toxicity measured lasted 1 week, 35.2%; 2 weeks, 31.0%; 3 weeks, 15.5%; 4 weeks, 11.3%; 5 weeks, 4.2%; and 6 weeks, 2.8%. Conclusion: Most of the patients, 393/396 (99.2%), tolerated a 100 mL endorectal immobilization balloon for IMRT. The rate of acute anorectal toxicity was acceptable with no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Duration of the toxicities typically was 1 to 2 weeks. Patients with pre-existing anorectal disease are at higher risk of developing acute anorectal toxicity with the use of an endorectal balloon.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 11
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
High-precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) of prostate cancer -: A new technique for exact positioning of the prostate at the time of treatment [J].
Bergström, P ;
Löfroth, PO ;
Widmark, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :305-311
[2]
Chen ME, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1800, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1800::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[3]
2-D
[4]
TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) [J].
COX, JD ;
STETZ, J ;
PAJAK, TF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1341-1346
[5]
A practical method to achieve prostate gland immobilization and target verification for daily treatment [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Lopes, L ;
Nissen, K ;
O'Farrell, DA ;
Gordon, L ;
Tempany, CM ;
Cormack, RA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1431-1436
[6]
A comparison of ventilatory prostate movement in four treatment positions [J].
Dawson, LA ;
Litzenberg, DW ;
Brock, KK ;
Sanda, M ;
Sullivan, M ;
Sandler, HM ;
Balter, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02) :319-323
[7]
Gerstner N, 1999, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V175, P232, DOI 10.1007/BF02742401
[8]
Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions [J].
Kitamura, K ;
Shirato, H ;
Seppenwoolde, Y ;
Onimaru, R ;
Oda, M ;
Fujita, K ;
Shimizu, S ;
Shinohara, N ;
Harabayashi, T ;
Miyasaka, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05) :1117-1123
[9]
Organ motion and its management [J].
Langen, KM ;
Jones, DTL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (01) :265-278
[10]
A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer [J].
Lattanzi, J ;
McNeeley, S ;
Pinover, W ;
Horwitz, E ;
Das, I ;
Schultheiss, TE ;
Hanks, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (04) :719-725