The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences

被引:65
作者
Michaelson, J
Satija, S
Moore, R
Weber, G
Halpern, E
Garland, A
Puri, D
Kopans, DB
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Surg Oncol, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
mammogram; screen detected; nonmammographic criteria; invasive tumors;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.10154
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to describe the pattern of screening utilization and its consequences in terms of tumor size and time of tumor appearance of invasive breast carcinoma among a population of women who were examined at a large service screening/diagnostic program over the last decade. METHODS. Utilization of mammography was assessed from a population of 59,899 women who received 196,891 mammograms at the Massachusetts General Hospital Breast Imaging Division from January 1, 1990 to March 1, 1999, among which 604 invasive breast tumors were found. Two hundred six invasive, clinically detected tumors also were seen during this period among women who had no record of a previous mammogram. Additional information was available on screening of women from March 1, 1999 to June 1, 2001. RESULTS. Fifty percent of the women who used screening did not begin until the age of 50 years, although 25% of the invasive breast tumors were found in women age < 50 years, Relatively few of the women who used screening returned promptly for their annual examinations; by 1.5 years, only 50% had returned. Approximately 25% of the invasive breast tumors were found in women for whom there was no record of a previous screening mammogram, and these tumors were larger (median, 15 mm) than the screen-detected tumors (median, 10 mm). Approximately 30% of the 604 invasive breast tumors in the screening population were found on nonmammographic grounds, and they also were larger (median, 15 mm) than the screen-detected tumors (median, 10 mm). However, only 3% of these 604 tumors were found by nomnammographic criteria within 6 months of the previous negative examination, and only 12% were found within 1 year. By back calculating the likely size of each of these tumors at the time of the negative mammogram, it could be seen that most tumors probably emerged as larger, palpable masses not because they were missed at the previous negative mammogram, because most were too small then to have been detected, but because too much time had been allowed to pass. CONCLUSIONS. Far too many women did not comply with the American Cancer Society recommendation of prompt annual screening from the age of 40 years. Consequently, almost 50% of the invasive tumors emerged as larger and, thus, potentially more lethal, palpable masses. (C) 2002 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Blackman D K, 1999, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V48, P1
[2]  
Elwood M, 1998, NEW ZEAL MED J, V111, P180
[3]  
FOURNIER D V, 1980, Cancer, V45, P2198, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2198::AID-CNCR2820450832>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-7
[5]   REPEAT MAMMOGRAPHY AMONG WOMEN OVER 50-YEARS-OF-AGE [J].
HOWE, HL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1992, 8 (03) :182-185
[6]   Variability in the timing of repeat screening mammography [J].
Jepson, C ;
Barudin, JL ;
Weiner, JR .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 26 (04) :483-485
[7]  
Johnson MM, 1996, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V87, P176
[8]   Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography [J].
Kerlikowske, K ;
Grady, D ;
Barclay, J ;
Sickles, EA ;
Ernster, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (01) :33-38
[9]  
Kopans D B, 1997, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V6, P233
[10]  
Kopans D. B., 1997, BREAST IMAGING