Less power = less human? Effects of power differentials on dehumanization

被引:101
作者
Gwinn, Jason D. [1 ]
Judd, Charles M. [1 ]
Park, Bernadette [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Power; Dehumanization; Social perception; UNIQUELY HUMAN EMOTIONS; SELF; ATTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments demonstrated that power leads to dehumanizing others, adding to our understanding of how power affects interpersonal perception. Undergraduate participants in dyads were assigned to unequal power roles before interacting cooperatively in a mock hiring-task for Experiment 1 and competitively in a game for Experiment 2. After interacting, participants rated each other on personality traits that vary in how much they are a uniquely human trait (UH; e.g. a trait that typically distinguishes humans from animals). In both experiments, high-power participants attributed fewer uniquely human traits to low-power participants than vice versa, meaning they animalistically dehumanized a fellow student from the same university. This dehumanization occurred even while high-power participants did not evaluatively derogate low-power participants. We argue that power differences can result in perceived disparities in humanity, perhaps because UH can both express and justify power. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 470
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency [J].
Bandura, A .
JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2002, 31 (02) :101-119
[2]   Infrahumanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup [J].
Cortes, BP ;
Demoulin, S ;
Rodriguez, RT ;
Rodriguez, AP ;
Leyens, JP .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (02) :243-253
[3]   Leader-follower effects in resource dilemmas: The roles of leadership selection and social responsibility [J].
De Cremer, David ;
van Dijk, Eric .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2008, 11 (03) :355-369
[4]   Motivation to support a desired conclusion versus motivation to avoid an undesirable conclusion:: The case of infra-humanization [J].
Demoulin, S ;
Leyens, JP ;
Rodríguez-Torres, R ;
Rodríguez-Pérez, A ;
Paladin, PM ;
Fiske, ST .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 40 (06) :416-428
[5]   From power to action [J].
Galinsky, AD ;
Gruenfeld, DH ;
Magee, JC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (03) :453-466
[6]   Power and perspectives not taken [J].
Galinsky, Adam D. ;
Magee, Joe C. ;
Inesi, M. Ena ;
Gruenfeld, Deborah H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) :1068-1074
[7]   Power and the objectification of social targets [J].
Gruenfeld, Deborah H. ;
Inesi, M. Ena ;
Magee, Joe C. ;
Galinsky, Adam D. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (01) :111-127
[8]   Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable [J].
Guinote, A ;
Judd, CM ;
Brauer, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 82 (05) :708-721
[9]  
Haney Craig., 1973, International Journal of Criminology Penology, V1, P69, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0076835
[10]   More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others [J].
Haslam, N ;
Bain, P ;
Douge, L ;
Lee, M ;
Bastian, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 89 (06) :937-950