Confusion and complex learning during interactions with computer learning environments

被引:87
作者
Lehman, Blair [1 ]
D'Mello, Sidney [1 ]
Graesser, Art [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Confusion; Cognitive disequilibrium; Complex learning; Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Confusion induction; AFFECTIVE STATES; RISK-TAKING; MODEL; NEUROSCIENCE; EMOTIONS; JUDGMENT; MOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Folk wisdom holds that being confused is detrimental to learning. However, research on emotions and learning suggest a somewhat more complex relationship between confusion and learning outcomes. In fact, it has been proposed that impasses that trigger states of cognitive disequilibrium and confusion can create opportunities for deep learning of conceptually difficult content. This paper discusses four computer learning environments that either naturally or artificially induce confusion in learners in order to create learning opportunities. First, an Intelligent Tutoring System called AutoTutor that engenders confusion through challenging problems and vague hints is described. The remaining three environments were specifically designed to induce confusion through a number of different interventions. These interventions include device breakdowns, contradictory information, and false feedback. The success and limitations of confusion induction and the impact of confusion resolution on learning are discussed. Potential methods to help learners productively manage their confusion instead of being hopelessly confused are also discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 194
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Students' daily emotions in the classroom: Intra-individual variability and appraisal correlates [J].
Ahmed, Wondimu ;
van der Werf, Greetje ;
Minnaert, Alexander ;
Kuyper, Hans .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 80 (04) :583-597
[2]  
Anderson T., 2004, THEORY PRACTICE ONLI, P33
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM PSYCHOL SOC OBSER
[4]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGY DISCOVERY S
[5]  
[Anonymous], INDUCING TR IN PRESS
[6]   Emotion Sensors Go To School [J].
Arroyo, Ivon ;
Cooper, David G. ;
Burleson, Winslow ;
Woolf, Beverly Park ;
Muldner, Kasia ;
Christopherson, Robert .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: BUILDING LEARNING SYSTEMS THAT CARE: FROM KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION TO AFFECTIVE MODELLING, 2009, 200 :17-+
[7]   Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments [J].
Baker, Ryan S. J. D. ;
D'Mello, Sidney K. ;
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T. ;
Graesser, Arthur C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2010, 68 (04) :223-241
[8]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI
[9]   Toward a Psychology of Human Agency [J].
Bandura, Albert .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 1 (02) :164-180
[10]   The experience of emotion [J].
Barrett, Lisa Feldman ;
Mesquita, Batja ;
Ochsner, Kevin N. ;
Gross, James J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 :373-403