Confusion and complex learning during interactions with computer learning environments

被引:87
作者
Lehman, Blair [1 ]
D'Mello, Sidney [1 ]
Graesser, Art [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Confusion; Cognitive disequilibrium; Complex learning; Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Confusion induction; AFFECTIVE STATES; RISK-TAKING; MODEL; NEUROSCIENCE; EMOTIONS; JUDGMENT; MOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Folk wisdom holds that being confused is detrimental to learning. However, research on emotions and learning suggest a somewhat more complex relationship between confusion and learning outcomes. In fact, it has been proposed that impasses that trigger states of cognitive disequilibrium and confusion can create opportunities for deep learning of conceptually difficult content. This paper discusses four computer learning environments that either naturally or artificially induce confusion in learners in order to create learning opportunities. First, an Intelligent Tutoring System called AutoTutor that engenders confusion through challenging problems and vague hints is described. The remaining three environments were specifically designed to induce confusion through a number of different interventions. These interventions include device breakdowns, contradictory information, and false feedback. The success and limitations of confusion induction and the impact of confusion resolution on learning are discussed. Potential methods to help learners productively manage their confusion instead of being hopelessly confused are also discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 194
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[11]   MOOD AND MEMORY [J].
BOWER, GH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1981, 36 (02) :129-148
[12]   REPAIR THEORY - A GENERATIVE THEORY OF BUGS IN PROCEDURAL SKILLS [J].
BROWN, JS ;
VANLEHN, K .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1980, 4 (04) :379-426
[13]   Gender-specific approaches to developing emotionally intelligent learning companions [J].
Burleson, Winslow ;
Picard, Rosalind W. .
IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (04) :62-69
[14]  
Calvo RA, 2011, NEW PERSPECTIVES ON AFFECT AND LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1
[15]   PROMPTING, FEEDBACK AND ERROR CORRECTION IN THE DESIGN OF A SCENARIO MACHINE [J].
CARROLL, JM ;
KAY, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1988, 28 (01) :11-27
[16]   Inducing positive emotional state in Intelligent Tutoring Systems [J].
Chaffar, Soumaya ;
Derbali, Lotfi ;
Frasson, Claude .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: BUILDING LEARNING SYSTEMS THAT CARE: FROM KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION TO AFFECTIVE MODELLING, 2009, 200 :716-+
[17]  
Chi M.T., 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, P371, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327809JLS0101_4
[18]   RISK-TAKING - THEORETICAL, EMPIRICAL, AND EDUCATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
CLIFFORD, MM .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 26 (3-4) :263-297
[20]   How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought [J].
Clore, Gerald L. ;
Huntsinger, Jeffrey R. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (09) :393-399